National Post

Fracking no threat to water, epa says

- By Mark Dra jem and Jim Snyder

WASHINGTON • Hydraulic fracturing has contaminat­ed some drinking wells but the impact is not widespread, according to a landmark U.S. study of water pollution risks that has both foes and supporters of the drilling method declaring victory.

The draft analysis by the Environmen­tal Protection Agency, released Thursday after three years of study, looked at possible ways fracking could contaminat­e drinking water. The EPA said these include spills of the fracking fluids, poor waste water disposal or migration of chemicals shot undergroun­d to break apart shale rock.

“We conclude there are above- and below-ground mechanisms by which hydraulic fracturing activities have the potential to impact drinking water resources,” the EPA said in the report. But, “we did not find evidence that these mechanisms have led to widespread, systemic impacts on drinking-water resources.”

The study was commission­ed by Congress and represents the most comprehens­ive assessment of the safety

(No) widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources

of fracking, a technique that has led to a boom in domestic oil and gas production but also spawned persistent complaints about pollution.

The American Petroleum Institute said the study was a validation of the safety of fracking, in which water, sand and chemicals are shot undergroun­d to free trapped oil or gas. It said it showed existing oversight from state regulators is working.

“Hydraulic fracturing is being done safely under the strong environmen­tal stewardshi­p of state regulators and industry best practices,” said API’s Erik Milito.

Environmen­tal groups pointed to sections of the study that confirmed some water contaminat­ion linked to fracking, and said that undercut the oft-repeated contention from industry groups that fracking had never led to water woes.

The study provides “solid science that fracking has contaminat­ed drinking water across the country,” Amy Mall, a senior policy analyst for the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in an interview.

Another environmen­tal group, Earthworks, said the study pointed to the need for regulation. “Now the Obama administra­tion, Congress, and state government­s must act on that informatio­n to protect our drinking water, and stop perpetuati­ng the oil and gas industry’s myth that fracking is safe,” said Lauren Pagel.

The study included an analysis of industry-backed disclosure­s of the chemicals used in fracking, case studies of local communitie­s where homeowners feared their water wells were contaminat­ed and a review of well constructi­on.

 ?? Jim Wilson / The New York Times files ?? Hydraulic fracturing has not had a widespread effect on U.S. water supplies, but does have the potential to contaminat­e drinking water, an EPA study finds.
Jim Wilson / The New York Times files Hydraulic fracturing has not had a widespread effect on U.S. water supplies, but does have the potential to contaminat­e drinking water, an EPA study finds.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada