POLYGAMY CHARGE UNFAIR, LAWYER SAYS
Fundamentalist Mormon leader back in courtroom
VANCOUVER • A polygamy charge against the leader of a fundamentalist, Mormon breakaway commune in southeastern British Columbia is unfair and should be thrown out because he was not given “fair notice,” a court has heard.
Winston Blackmore’s lawyer Joe Arvay argued in B.C. Supreme Court Monday the provincial government does not have the right to criminally charge his client — or any resident of Bountiful, B.C. — for historical acts of polygamy.
The cutoff point, said Arvay, should be a 2011 reference question that concluded polygamy laws did not violate the Charter of Rights & Freedoms; that decision provided constitutional clarity to Canadians involved in the controversial practice.
“The whole point of having a reference (case) was to give those people fair notice that their conduct was lawful or unlawful,” Arvay said.
“It would be unfair to the people of Bountiful to prosecute them for conduct that they were led to believe by many people in authority was lawful.”
Blackmore is one of the heads of Bountiful, B.C., a remote, fundamentalist community whose name has become synonymous with the practice of polygamy.
Arvay told the court Blackmore’s 25 alleged marriages took place in 19752001, predating the reference question by a decade.
He argued Blackmore’s polygamy charge should be quashed because the government acted improperly by appointing successive prosecutors until it got the recommendation it wanted.
“This is yet another case of, to use the vernacular, ‘ shopping’ for a prosecutor to do something the first prosecutor wouldn’t do,” he said.
In 2007, special prosecutor Richard Peck concluded that polygamy was the root cause of Bountiful’s alleged issues.
But rather than recommend charges he suggested a constitutional question be referred to the courts to provide more legal clarity.
Instead, the province opted to appoint other prosecutors until one eventually recommended taking legal action in 2009.
Those charges were thrown out later that year, after Arvay successfully argued the province had acted improperly by giving the new prosecutor an identical mandate to the first.
The province answered by posing a reference question to the B.C. Supreme Court on the constitutionality of polygamy.
Later on Monday, Crown lawyer Karen Horsman refuted Arvay’s claims, arguing circumstances had changed enough since Peck’s recommendations to warrant the appointment of special prosecutor Peter Wilson in 2012.
In addition to the earlier reference question clearing up the legal grey area, Horsman said new evidence had come to light when American police seized records from a fundamentalist ranch in Texas.
She said the 2008 investigation revealed girls were allegedly moving across the border between polygamous communities.
Horsman also told court that Arvay’s argument would effectively tie the province’s hands by “grandfathering” Blackmore into the law.
She said he’d be granted “perpetual criminal immunity” for ongoing polygamous relationships that predated the reference question.
This is yet another case of ‘shopping’ for a prosecutor to do something the first prosecutor wouldn’t