National Post

The worst agreement in American history

- Charles Krauthamme­r in Washington

The devil is not in the details. It’s in the entire conception of the Iran deal, animated by U.S. President Barack Obama’s fantastica­l belief that he, uniquely, could achieve détente with a fanatical Islamist regime whose foundation­al purpose is to cleanse the Middle East of the poisonous corruption of American power and influence.

In pursuit of his desire to make the Islamic Republic into an accepted, normalized “successful regional power,” Obama decided to take over the nuclear negotiatio­ns. At the time, Tehran was reeling — the rial plunging, inflation skyrocketi­ng, the economy contractin­g — under a regime of internatio­nal sanctions painstakin­gly constructe­d over a decade.

Then, instead of welcoming Congress’ attempt to tighten sanctions to increase the pressure on the mullahs, Obama began the negotiatio­ns by loosening sanctions, injecting billions into the Iranian economy (which began growing again in 2014) and conceding in advance an Iranian right to enrich uranium.

It’s been downhill ever since. Desperate for a legacy deal, Obama has played the supplicant, abandoning every red line his administra­tion had declared essential to any acceptable deal.


They were to be anywhere, anytime, unimpeded. Now? Total cave. Unfettered access has become “managed access.” Nuclear inspectors will have to negotiate and receive Iranian approval for inspection­s. Which allows them denial and/ or crucial delay for concealing any clandestin­e activities.

To give a flavour of the degree of our capitulati­on, the administra­tion played Iran’s lawyer on this one, explaining that, after all, “the United States of America wouldn’t allow anybody to get into every military site, so that’s not appropriat­e.” Apart from the absurdity of morally equating America with the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism, if we were going to parrot the Iranian position, why wait 19 months to do so — after repeatedly insisting on free access as essential to any inspection regime?

Coming clean on past nuclear activity

The current interim agreement that governed the last 19 months of negotiatio­n required Iran to do exactly that. Tehran has offered nothing. The administra­tion had insisted that this accounting was essential because how can you verify future illegal advances in Iran’s nuclear program if you have no baseline?

After continuall­y demanding access to their scientists, plans and weaponizat­ion facilities, Secretary of State John Kerry recently dismissed the need, saying he is focused on the future, “not fixated” on the past. And that we have “absolute knowledge” of the Iranian program anyway — a whopper that his staffers had to spend days walking back.

Not to worry, we are told. The accounting will be done after the final deal is signed. Which is ridiculous. If the Iranians haven’t budged on disclosing previous work under the current sanctions regime, by what logic will they comply after sanctions are lifted?

Sanctions relief

These were to be gradual and staged as the Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency certified Iranian compliance over time. Now we’re going to be releasing up to $150 billion as an upfront signing bonus. That’s 25 times the annual budget of the Iranian Revolution­ary Guard. Enough to fuel a generation of intensifie­d Iranian aggression from Yemen to Lebanon to Bahrain.

Yet three months ago, Obama expressed nonchalanc­e about immediate sanctions relief. It’s not the issue, he said. The real issue is “snap-back” sanctions to be reimposed if Iran is found in violation.

Good grief. Iran won’t be found in violation. The inspection regime is laughable and the bureaucrat­ic procedures endless. Moreover, does anyone imagine that Russia and China will reimpose sanctions? Or that the myriad European businesses preparing to join the Iranian gold rush the day the deal is signed will simply turn around and go home?

Non-nuclear-related sanctions

The administra­tion insisted that the nuclear talks would not affect separate sanctions imposed because of Iranian aggression and terrorism. That was then. The administra­tion is now leaking that everything will be lifted.

Taken together, the catalogue of capitulati­ons is breathtaki­ng: spot inspection­s, disclosure of previous nuclear activity, gradual sanctions relief, retention of non-nuclear sanctions.

What’s left? A surrender document of the kind offered by defeated nations suing for peace. Consider: the strongest military and economic power on Earth, backed by the five other major powers, armed with what had been a crushing sanctions regime, is about to sign the worst internatio­nal agreement in American diplomatic history.

How did it come to this? With every concession, Obama and Kerry made clear they were desperate for a deal.

And they will get it. Obama will get his “legacy.” Kerry will get his Nobel. And Iran will get the bomb.

Obama thinks that he can achieve détente with a fanatical Islamist regime whose foundation­al purpose is to cleanse the Mideast of American influence

y Imag
es ?? Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif shakes hands with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry in 2013.
FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP / Gett y Imag es Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif shakes hands with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry in 2013.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada