National Post

PETER FOSTER … Foreign-funded radicals.

- peter foster

Liberal leader Justin Trudeau’s comment this week about wanting to grow the economy “from the heart outwards” is destined to haunt him. Big Dipper Tom Mulcair immediatel­y leapt on the bêtise, claiming “I don’t think you can grow the economy with touchy-feely slogans.” True, except Mulcair’s master plan is based on hiking minimum wages, subsidizin­g day care jobs, hoisting corporate taxes, and promoting “sustainabi­lity.” That represents a mushy combinatio­n of the touchy-feely, the angry-bashy, and the outright subversive.

Trudeau doubled his muddledom by suggesting that Stephen Harper wanted to grow the economy “from the top down.” In fact, the Conservati­ve leader is the only one possessing any acquaintan­ce with the bottom-up and best-left-alone nature of economic markets — even if political populism has frequently led him to offend against such inconvenie­nt truth. Indeed, this week the Prime Minister delivered another unfortunat­e example of cheap populism with a commitment to investigat­e the role of foreign buyers in boosting Canadian real estate.

A much greater priority should be to investigat­e the role of foreign interests in trying to tank the Canadian housing market, indeed the whole economy, by retarding resource and pipeline developmen­t. Both foreign and foreign-funded environmen­tal NGOs’ disproport­ionate and often coercive power has been critical in holding up the Keystone XL pipeline, which has become the focus for a larger campaign of misinforma­tion and intimidati­on regarding the oil sands. And this isn’t just about oil. It’s also about hard rock mining and forestry. The Prime Minister noted last weekend that the NDP “binds itself with groups that are trying to shut down the Canadian forest industry.” Again, the most powerful of those groups are foreign-based, although they have scores of radical local allies. They all tend to have contempt for democracy.

Back in 2008, in the wake of successful­ly promoting draconian species-at-risk legislatio­n in Liberal Ontario, groups including the Suzuki Foundation, Environmen­tal Defence and Ecojustice crowed at how they had successful­ly subverted the review process by excluding northern communitie­s from consultati­on.

Recently, the ongoing one-way “war in the woods” has seen a welcome counteratt­ack from Resolute Forest Products in the form of a lawsuit against Greenpeace for defamation and interferen­ce with economic relations. This particular front in what has so far been a losing battle goes back to the bad-faith Canadian Boreal Forest Agreement, CBFA, that was forced on forestry companies by ENGO do-not-buy campaigns. The CBFA was “brokered” by the Philadelph­ia-based Pew Charitable Trusts, whose wealth comes, ironically, from the men who pioneered the developmen­t of the oil sands. Canadian anti-developmen­t campaigns have also been funded by other giant U.S. foundation­s bearing names such as Rockefelle­r, Ford, Hewlett, and Packard, all laundered through organizati­ons such as Tides.

According to some reports, Obama may be on the point of giving Keystone XL a definitive thumbs down. His problem is that he has

Obama may be on the point of giving Keystone XL a definitive thumbs down

no credible reason. He has repeatedly put off approval on the laughable basis of whether the pipeline might have a “significan­t” impact on climate. He has also put off approval because of ENGO-ers chaining themselves to the railings of the White House

Radical ENGOs have infiltrate­d — or perhaps more accurately have been welcomed into — the U.S. administra­tion via what a recent U.S. Senate report called a “revolving green door” between Obama’s chosen administra­tive weapon, the Environmen­tal Protection Agency (EPA) and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

The EPA, through which Obama is seeking to impose his Clean Power Plan to close down the coal industry, has marshalled sophistic arguments against Keystone XL, while the NRDC has peddled egregious misinforma­tion, seeking to portray diluted bitumen as “franken-crude,” and misreprese­nting data on pipeline leaks in Alberta. Three years ago, the NRDC’s Susan Casey-Lefkowitz declared baldly “Keystone XL is not in the national interest.” She also announced that the NRD C was ready to oppose Northern Gateway, which crosses no part of the U.S.

One typically perverse result of the anti-pipeline jihad is that more oil has been diverted to rail which, as a report on Thursday from the Fraser Institute’s Ken Green points out, is more than four times less safe than pipelines (although that doesn’t mean unsafe).

Justin Trudeau has suggested that Stephen Harper is at fault for the state of poor Canadian U.S. relations. In fact, that deteriorat­ion is due not to Harper, but to the power of groups such as the NRDC, which feed Obama’s stubborn legacy commitment to being a latter-day King Canute, who will order the oceans to halt their (minuscule) rise. And we shouldn’t forget that while he is truly rolling back Canadian oil, Obama is also promoting more production in Iran. How loopy is that?

Obama displayed his contempt for Canada by appointing a Wall Street bagman, Bruce Heyman, as ambassador. A year ago, during a Q&A session with Frank McKenna, Heyman discounted Canadian concerns about Keystone XL and other issues as like obsessing about a tiny scratch on a car. During a testy exchange with the former Premier of New Brunswick, Heyman lectured that Keystone XL was taking its time to work through the system because the administra­tion had received three million “comments.”

He didn’t note — or perhaps didn’t know — that the vast majority of those comments had been mass-manufactur­ed by the radical environmen­tal movement. Similarly, U.S.-based ForestEthi­cs, a thuggish ally in Greenpeace’s assault on Resolute, boasted about having manufactur­ed 87 per cent of the comments to Canada’s Joint Review Panel on the Northern Gateway pipeline.

When gauging environmen­talism’s infiltrati­on of the political process in Canada, it’s worth noting that Trudeau’s chief adviser is Gerald Butts, a former head of the Canadian arm of the WWF, a multinatio­nal organizati­on and self-appointed dispenser of “social licence” that hides radical policies and big-money corporate shakedowns behind concern for Pandas and Caribou, and specialize­s in indoctrina­ting children. Butts also advised Dalton McGuinty, who presided over not just that species at risk act but also Ontario’s disastrous­ly expensive Green Energy plan.

WWF Canada’s current head, lefty former Toronto mayor David Miller, has suggested that Canadians just say no to legal process and democracy when it comes to projects such as Northern Gateway. As such, he is just echoing the NRDC’s Casey-Leftywitch.

Significan­tly, the NRDC was ecstatic at the election of Rachel Notley. No doubt they would welcome Tom Mulcair or Justin Trudeau too. From the heart.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada