National Post

A new model for heath care

- Jason Field and Jeff rey Graham Jason Field is President and CEO of Life Sciences Ontario. Jeffrey Graham is Partner, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.

Public opinion polls tell us that confidence in our health care system has eroded and there is increased anxiety about the sustainabi­lity of public funding. There is also growing evidence that our system is no longer a high performing system compared to other countries and there is great concern that our system is continuing to fall behind.

In the past, the federal government has been an important catalyst for evaluation of our system including the final report of the National Forum on Health, the Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, chaired by Roy Romanow, and the report of the Standing Committee on Social Affairs, chaired by former Senator Michael Kirby. In recent years, some have suggested that our government was less interested in leading discussion­s aimed at enhancing the delivery of health care in Canada than in the past. Evidence that this conclusion may have been unwarrante­d was the decision of Minister of Health, Rona Ambrose, to mandate an expert advisory panel led by one of Canada’s policy scholars, Dr. David Naylor. The final report on Healthcare Innovation (Naylor Report) that has helped focus the debate on the future of our health care system around policy proposals that aim to make the Canadian Health Care system a high performanc­e system once again.

There is much to digest and many important observatio­ns and recommenda­tions to assess in the Advisory Panel’s report. We are particular­ly pleased to see the recognitio­n by the Advisory Panel of the important role that industry can play in achieving a greater level of innovation within the health sector. The importance of creat- ing a more innovative Canadian society has been highlighte­d in other reports, like the recommenda­tions of the Coalition for Action on Innovation led by Paul Lucas and John Manley. However, these reports have typically not been focused on a particular industry within the economy but rather on the broader concept of innovation. The Naylor Report is the first major Canadian health sector report, to our knowledge, to recognize the important role that the health care industry can play in helping to achieve consensus on public policy objectives.

The Advisory Panel notes that the health care products and services industry has the potential to create pros- perity while helping Canada’s health care systems to deliver higher quality or more cost effective care and Canadian patients to enjoy longer and better lives. In this regard, the Advisory Panel notes a number of important areas where more can be done.

For example, the Advisory Panel notes the potential for personaliz­ed or precision medicine to increasing­ly tailor diagnostic, treatment and prevention strategies to subpopulat­ions and individual­s. The panel calls for the commercial­ization of made-in-Canada precision medicine concepts and tools from the many Canadian researcher­s, and early- and later-stage companies working at the leading edge of this field.

The Advisory Panel notes the concerns of many with the inefficien­t and duplicativ­e regulatory processed governing health care products and services in Canada. This is an area where having two levels of government and 13 jurisdicti­ons involved do not necessaril­y promote innovation. In this area of government, as in many others, we need to simply put aside constituti­onal constraint­s more appropriat­e for the 20th century in favour of cooperativ­e solutions in governance and regulation more appropriat­e for a highly competitiv­e global marketplac­e of the 21st century.

The Advisory Panel notes that Canada is a small market on the internatio­nal stage, made less attractive by a systematic lack of collaborat­ion and coordinati­on of procuremen­t. A recent report from the Ontario Health Innovation Council came to a similar conclusion. The Advisory Panel heard from both domestic innovators who simply look to internatio­nal markets (avoiding Canada altogether) in which to commercial­ize their inventions because of the challenges of doing so in Canada and internatio­nal firms who hesitate to enter the Canadian market for similar reasons. Neither of these results is desirable.

Regardless of the outcome of the upcoming federal election this fall, the next federal government will need to address the serious challenges that have been described in the Naylor Report. There has never been a time when the leadership of the federal government has been more needed.

The health care products industry has the potential to create prosperity while helping patients to enjoy longer and better lives

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada