National Post

‘Good debt’ goes bad: Which kind is wrong for you.

Why it can be dangerous to categorize what you owe

- By Danielle Kubes

H-ere’s what I’ve al ways wondered: You have a Toronto couple, standing beside the semi-detached house that they just paid $1 million for — $800,000 of which they owe to the bank — and they’re beaming. They take selfies and post them on Instagram.

Then you have a girl, let’s say 25, who is crying, feeling like an i-diot. She went on an all-inclu sive vacation, then the zipper on her winter coat broke so she bought another. She wanted a w-arm one, it’s cold in Saskatch ewan where our fictional lady lives, and so she bought one with real goose feathers. It was a splurge, she knows. Somehow, the little things, they all added up, and she now owes $8,000 to Visa.

So, my question is: Is our dualistic attitude, where we moralize debt as “good” or “bad,” causing us to become so complacent about the former that it’s piling up to the point that it’s turning into the latter?

“Bad” debt, defined as borr-owing to purchase depreciati­ng assets like, cars and couches, seems to always impose shame even if it’s a modest amount and even if it’s obtained cheaply.

Traditiona­lly, bad debt was expensive, which may have lent c-olour to its already nasty repu tation, spurred by its frequent ties to “frivolous” consumer items.

Credit cards, payday loans and financing plans like the Br-Dick’s “on’t Pay a Cent Event” l-end money at rates often start ing near 20 per cent and have inflexible, even predatory terms. But only a minuscule number of Canadians carry credit card debt — as of August 2015, it made up just five per cent of our overall household debt, according to the Canadian Bankers Associatio­n.

In a time of historical­ly low interest rates, it’s far more likely that Ca-nadians are buying depreciati­ng assets by using lines of credit, which have interest r-ates as low as 3.5 per cent. Ac cording to the CB A, lines of credit make up 20 per cent of Canadians’ total indebtedne­ss, and we owe a total of $266 bill-ion on them, up from $35 bil lion in 2000.

“Good” debt — spent on anything that can help you make m oney — on the other hand, seems to introduce nervous cheer, even if the dollar figure is an overwhelmi­ng amount.

Canadians have embraced this sort of debt like no other. O-f the nearly $1.9 trillion Statistics Canada says we owe, m-ore than 70 per cent of it is be cause of mortgages. University graduates — education being the other common example of “good” debt — are in the hole for an average of about $27,000 each, according to the Canadian Federation of Students.

The popularity of “good” debt could partly be because it’s the cheapest form of debt. Five-year fixed mortgages, for example, are available for as little as 2.42 per cent. Still, eat a handful of almonds or bite into a chocolate bar and your body will gain weight at the same rate. A calorie is a calorie, whether it comes from a “good” fat or a “bad.”

S-o what makes debt differ ent?

“Ideally, no one wants to have any debt,” says Laurie Campbell, CEO of Credit Canada, a non- profit organizati­on that provides financial counsellin­g. “Debt is debt. Sometimes debt is for a good cause, like securing a house or getting an education, so it’s a necessary evil.”

Sean Co-oper is a prime ex ample of how a house, though a temporary burden, can truly be a “good” debt.

W-hen this 30-year-old pen s-ion analyst purchased a prop e-rty in an up-and-coming bor ough just east of Toronto, he e-nsured that the monthly mort g-age payments were an appro priate percentage of his income and he planned an aggressive budget, including suspending contributi­ons to his TFSA, to pay it off.

“My debt weighed on me,” he says. “I didn’t feel comfortabl­e h-aving six figures of debt hang ing over my head, so I vowed to pay it down as soon as possible.

“You’re using leverage to grow your net worth,” Cooper s ays. “And long as housing prices continue to go up, you’re in good shape.”

Cooper’s sacrifices paid off, and in just three years he had paid the $225,000 mortgage in full.

But, he cautions, that doesn’t mean all mortgage debt is good debt.

“Even with good debt you can have too much good debt,” Co oper says. “A lot of people, when they go to a bank, they don’t know how much they want to spend on a house and when the bank gives them $800,000 they buy themselves t-he most expensive house pos sible and give themselves no breathing room at all if rates go up.”

Campbell offers a similar caution.

Particular­ly dangerous, she says, is the exploding trend of HELOCs, where homeowners get a line of credit by using their property as collateral. It’s an e-specially tempting way to bor r-ow because it is easily access ible, available at a low interest rate and you can get huge sums — up to 65 per cent of your property’s value.

That’s probably why more than 22 per cent of homeowners had a HELOC in 2014, owing an average of $57,000, according to the Canadian Associatio­n of Accredited Mort- gage Profes sionals ( AAMP-). Next to mort gages, H LCO s are now banks’ b-iggest consumer lending prod uct.

Canadians surveyed by CAAMP in 2014 say they are most commonly taking out HELCO s to consolidat­e or pay off debt. That makes sense, since the interest rates on HELCO s can be six times less than credit cards.

But it’s curious that Canadian homeowners even have high-interest debt in the first place. One reason may be that they simply can’t meet their monthly expenses because so much of their cash flow is tied up in their mortgage payments.

“They say a house is a good d- ebt. ‘ It’s OK to have a mort gage and I can even dip into any equity in my home and have a second mortgage and it’s still good debt,’” Campbell s ays. “( But) they’re failing to recognize in some cases they’re so house poor, they don’t have m-oney for their regular expens es and they start using not good credit, like credit cards, to cover the debt.”

That’s what happened to Hyla Korn but with another type of “good” debt: student loans. This Toronto lawyer, 33, graduated in 2009 with $115,700 in student debt. She soon secured a job and was able to make her payments while budgeting carefully and living at home. But then Korn was laid o-ff. Without an income, her sav ings soon dwindled.

“The bank isn’t forgiving at all if you lose your job,” she says. Without any alternativ­es, she had to use her credit card to fill the gap.

Is it even fair to consider credit card debt “bad,” if Canadians are often using it to chase the good?

“I don’t think it’s good or b-ad,” Korn says. “I think every one now who goes to school, a-nyone that does any type of de gree beyond undergrad, would incur some debt.”

Unfortunat­ely, Korn is right w-hen she says that debt is “in evitable.” Like the housing m- arket, the education busi ness has outpaced wages so fast that the majority of Canadians have no option but to finance their schooling: Either parents give them the money or a bank loans it. “That’s the reality of the world we’re living in,” Campbell says. “Nothing comes easy.”

To minimize the impact, Campbell says we must consider both a leveraged home and a leveraged education as if they’re purchases like any other. A strategy focusing on the return is a must.

In the same way that “you’re not going to buy the most beautiful home in the crappiest neighbourh­ood,” she says, “you don’t go to school and get into a f-ield that is not going to materializ­e in a career over time.”

Ultimately, the distinctio­n between good and bad debt isn’t that important, since good debt can too easily slide into the opposite category. It’s far more important, says Campbell, that you can “manage your debt and see it dissipate over time.”

The bank isn’t forgiving at all if you lose your job

 ?? chlo e cushman / national post ??
chlo e cushman / national post

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada