National Post

Dispatchin­g deer: B.C. towns choose deportatio­n over death

- Tristin Hopper

After several controvers­ial years of killing their excess deer, a quartet of interior B.C. communitie­s are set to debut a new system of merely deporting their unwanted ungulates.

To be rolled out later this winter, the $100,000 program would live- trap 80 deer from the Kootenay-region towns of Kimberley, Invermere, Cranbrook and Elkford, and then truck them to far-flung wilderness areas.

“Whether deer retain some innate memory of predators can only be tested by moving deer from urban areas to natural areas,” Ian Adams, with VAST Resource Solutions, the architect of the new plan, told the Cranbrook Daily Townsman earlier this week.

And as Adams told another media outlet in the area, “these are animals that are now ac- customed to staring down perceived threats from people and pets, particular­ly dogs.”

The deer relocation plan was struck in response to massive opposition to the current policy of ensnaring urban deer in nighttime clover traps and then dispatchin­g someone in the morning with a bolt gun.

The Animal Alliance of Canada, for one, has favoured dealing with problem deer through anti-feeding bylaws, by distributi­ng deer birth control and “hazing” with dogs.

“Although hazing sounds like it is hard on the animals and likely to cause accidents and property damage, in reality, the deer are gently pressured by specially trained dogs and gingerly pick their way through the streets and out of town in the early dawn hours,” read a 2012 report by the group.

The B.C. SPCA has similarly opposed cull plans, saying they are not a “sustainabl­e, evi- dence-based solution.”

Of course, the Kootenay deer may similarly face an untimely death under the new system. After a lifetime in the rose gardens of Kimberley and Invermere, the animals are likely unprepared for the rigours of avoiding hungry wolves or cougars.

The relocation isn’t intended to clear the Kootenays of pesky deer, but is merely a pilot project. Roughly one- fifth of the deer will be fitted with GPS collars and monitored to see if they wander back into urban centres — or are immediatel­y felled by predators.

In recent years, Kootenay towns have joined a growing list of B.C. towns responding to deer infestatio­ns with culls. In 2014, for instance, the District of Invermere approved a $ 30,000 plan to cull no more than 30 deer.

“The lack of opposition in the (council) room today shows this is heading in the right direction,” Paul Denchuk told the Columbia Valley Pioneer at the time. “When we first sat as a council any time there was anything to do with the deer, there’d be 50 people in this room, yelling at us.”

In Cranbrook, deer opposition began to crystalliz­e around 2010 when a resident captured a video of a mother deer brutally attacking a neighbourh­ood dog.

The video has since been viewed more than 5.5 million times on YouTube.

 ?? Da rren Stone / Victoria Times colonist ?? Deer are “staring down” dogs
and people in B.C. towns.
Da rren Stone / Victoria Times colonist Deer are “staring down” dogs and people in B.C. towns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada