National Post

This time, the evangelica­ls chose Donald

- Charles Krauthamme­r

What happened to the evangelica­ls? They were supposed to be the bedrock of the Ted Cruz candidacy. Yet on Super Tuesday he lost them to Donald Trump.

Cruz still did make a reasonably good showing, winning Alaska, Oklahoma and Texas, the latter by an impressive 17 percentage points. But he didn’t have the great night he needed to put away Marco Rubio and emerge as Trump’s one remaining challenger.

Cruz had done all the groundwork to win evangelica­ls and sweep the South by putting together strong alliances with local pastors and leaders. And yet, outside Oklahoma and Texas, he lost to Trump by stunning margins — by 21 points in Alabama, 13 in Georgia, 14 in Tennessee, 16 in Virginia and 36 in, of all places, Massachuse­tts.

How could this have happened? A more scriptural­ly, spirituall­y flawed man than Trump would be hard to find. As several anti-Trump evangelica­l voices have argued, Christian witness cannot possibly support a thrice- married man with such an impressive list of sins, featuring especially spectacula­r displays of the seven deadlys.

These theologica­l arguments are both eloquent and impassione­d but, in this season of fear and anxiety, beside the point. This time around, evangelica­ls are not looking for someone like them. They’re looking for someone who will protect them.

They’ve tried backing exemplary Scripture- quoting Christians — without result. After Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum and considerat­ions of Cruz himself, they are increasing­ly reluctant to support likeminded candidates who are nonetheles­s incapable of advancing their cause in a hostile political arena so dominated by secularism.

They have no illusions about Trump. They have no expectatio­ns of religious uplift. What he offers them is not spirit but “muscle” ( to borrow a word from the notorious former Prof. Melissa Click of the University of Missouri).

The transactio­n was illuminate­d by Trump’ s January speech at Liberty University. His earlier halfhearte­d attempts to pose as a fellow evangelica­l were amusing and entirely unconvinci­ng. At Liberty, he made another such I’m- oneof- you gesture by citing a biblical verse in “Two Corinthian­s,” thereby betraying a risible lack of familiarit­y with biblical language and usage.

Yet elsewhere in the speech, he described how Christians abroad are being massacred and Christians here at home are under cultural and political siege. He pledged: “We’re going to protect Christiani­ty.”

Interestin­g locution. Not just Christians, but Christiani­ty itself. What Trump promises is to stand outside the churchyard gates and protect the faithful inside. He’s the Roman centurion standing between them and both barbarians abroad and aggressive secularist­s at home.

The message is clear: I may not be one of you. I can’t recite or even correctly cite Scripture. But I will patrol the borders of Christendo­m on your behalf. After all, who do you want out there — a choir boy or a tough guy with a loaded gun and a kick- ass demeanour?

Evangelica­ls answered resounding­ly. They went for Trump in a rout.

The essence of Trump’s appeal everywhere, far beyond evangelica­ls, is precisely the same: “I’m tough, I will protect you.” That’s why he remains so bulletproo­f. His lack of policy, the contradict­ory nature of his pronouncem­ents that pass as policy — especially their capricious eruption and summary abandonmen­t — have turned out to be an irrelevanc­e.

Who cares? His support has nothing to do with actual prescripti­ons. Tues- day night, the immigratio­n i ssue ranked l ow among Republican voters’ concerns. Only about 10 per cent deemed it their No. 1 issue. The political success of Trump’s draconian immigratio­n stance lies not in the policy, but in the attitude — a not- going- to- takeit- anymore defiance.

That’s the reason none of the rhetorical outrages that would have destroyed another candidacy have even left a mark on Trump. He mocks John McCain’s heroism, insults Carly Fiorina’s looks, fawns over Vladimir Putin — nothing. If anything, he gains support for fearless “telling it like it is” candour.

This is a man who three times last Sunday refused to disavow David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan. No other candidate could survive that. Trump not only survives, he thrives. Two days later, he wins seven out of 11 Super Tuesday states and ascends to the threshold of presumptiv­e nominee.

Which is why the only possible way to stop Trump is a full- scale, open- the-bomb-bay- doors attack on the very core of his appeal: his persona of the tough guy you can trust to protect you.

It may be too late. But everything else will simply bounce off the Teflon.

THIS TIME AROUND, CONSERVATI­VE CHRISTIANS ARE NOT LOOKING FOR SOMEONE LIKE THEM. THEY’RE LOOKING FOR SOMEONE WHO WILL PROTECT THEM.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada