National Post

Ontario’s Irresponsi­ble Actions Plan

-

The following is an open letter to Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne from Timothy M. Egan, president and CEO of the Canadian Gas Associatio­n. Dear Premier Wynne,

The leaked Climate Change Action Plan, according to The Globe and Mail, includes an agenda to move homes, businesses and other buildings off natural gas. This agenda is incredibly irresponsi­ble. Let me explain why.

First, it is irresponsi­ble because it arbitraril­y restricts the freedom of more than 3.5 million Ontario homes, businesses and industrial facilities currently using natural gas to meet their energy needs in the manner they want. Residentia­l and commercial space and water heating, industrial heating and other services are being met by natural gas. Almost 80 per cent of Ontario homes are heated with it, and overall it represents over 35 per cent of Ontario’s end- use energy needs — much more than electricit­y. On a cold day in winter, the energy equivalent of more than twice Ontario’s entire electricit­y system output goes through the natural gas system. Northern communitie­s, rural communitie­s, farms, businesses, industrial facilities and others currently not using natural gas want to use natural gas. But the climate change action plan will tell them they can’t — because your government says so.

Second, it is irresponsi­ble because of what it will cost. Homeowners and businesses choose natural gas for many reasons, but particular­ly because it is affordable. A transition for a homeowner from gas to electric heat could raise energy- space heating costs by up to $ 3,000 per year. That’s just the energy bill. Add to that the cost of purchasing the prescribed alternativ­e heating technology, the ducting retrofit required, tearing out natural gas systems, and building out the electric grid to meet the new demand. And what if a barbecue is gas-fired, or a water heater, or a dryer? Are you going to make homeowners choose more expensive options for all of those as well?

Energy affordabil­ity isn’t just important to families at home. It’s critical for business and industry. Energy is a major cost for any business; drive that cost up and the business will become less competitiv­e, less able to retain or hire workers, more likely to shut down, and more likely to move to other jurisdicti­ons where natural gas use is encouraged. Or what about schools and hospitals and other public institutio­ns that will see their energy bills rise? Shutting down natural gas use will reduce available funds for essential public services.

Third, it is irresponsi­ble because it will undermine the resilience of the energy system. How? When the electricit­y system fails, the gas system can meet a lot of energy demand — think about using your gas fireplace or stove even when the power is out. Our system is better because of this resilience: It means we are better able to withstand serious incidents. A system that is unduly dependent on any one delivery system is a less reliable system.

And fourth, it is irresponsi­ble because it amounts to a declaratio­n that the gas industry is incapable of finding innovative ways to reduce CO2 emissions. How about you ask utilities for those, rather than shutting down service delivery? If you want intermitte­nt electric renewables like wind and solar, you need a ready partner power source for reliabilit­y: Natural gas is the most effective one. Or if you want renewables, why just pursue electric renewables? Blend renewable natural gas into the grid — energy from municipal solid waste, or wastewater treatment, or agricultur­al waste, or biomass. It is often much more cost-effective.

Do you want to help rural communitie­s reduce their energy costs? Connect them to the gas grid. Do you want northern communitie­s off higher- cost, high- emitting fuels? Get them compressed ( CNG) or liquefied natural gas ( LNG). Do you want to cost-effectivel­y reduce transporta­tion sector emissions? Use CNG or LNG there, too. Don’t tell society how to achieve your objectives — give people the freedom to be creative themselves.

Ontario’s gas utilities believe natural gas has helped deliver a remarkable standard of living, contributi­ng to the building of a stronger province and country for over 100 years. We want to keep building on the natural gas opportunit­y — as part of a broader energy system that includes electricit­y, liquid fuels, energy efficiency, and emerging technologi­es. Shutting down natural gas will restrict choice and flexibilit­y.

We don’t know what the final Climate Change Action Plan will look like, but the leaked descriptio­n was not a good early signal. We are going to work hard to make sure our customers are aware of it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada