National Post

What the WHO? Global health agency flip-flops on coffee.

- Sharon Kirkey National Post Twitter. com/sharon_ kirkey

Twenty- five years after declaring one of the most consumed beverages in the world was “possibly carcinogen­ic to humans,” the World Health Organizati­on’s cancer agency has officially downgraded coffee’s cancer risk, saying an exhaustive review of the available science could find no conclusive evidence of harm.

Unless it’s drunk super hot.

According to 23 experts assembled by the Internatio­nal Agency f or Research on Cancer ( IARC), which last year decreed eating hotdogs and other processed meats caused cancer, said drinking “very hot beverages” at temperatur­es above 65 C probably causes cancer of the esophagus, one of the deadliest cancers.

That conclusion is based on epidemiolo­gical studies in China, Iran, Turkey and South America, where tea or maté, an infusion of the dried leaves of a shrub native to South America, is traditiona­lly served extremely hot — hot enough to burn the tongue. Those studies showed an increased risk of esophageal cancer the higher the temperatur­e.

Wh e n the experts weighed the evidence for coffee alone, however, they found no clear indication of risk associated with coffee drinking overall.

“This means simply that the data did not permit a conclusion either that it is safe or that it is dangerous,” Dr. Dana Loomis, deputy head of the IARC monographs program, said in a briefing from Paris.

The working group reviewed more than 1,000 studies in humans and animals. For 20 different cancers, the evidence was “inconclusi­ve.” However many studies showed coffee probably doesn’t increase the risk of breast and prostate cancer, and may significan­tly lower the risk of endometria­l and liver cancers.

In 1991, coffee was thought a possible cause of bladder cancer. The re- think means it moves down the agency’s list of potential carcinogen­s, from category 2b (“possibly” carcinogen­ic to humans) to group 3 (“not classifiab­le as to carcinogen­icity”).

Loomis said the science on coffee has become larger and stronger since 1991, and older studies in the 1970s linking coffee with bladder cancer could have been because of smoking or other biases.

While “very hot” drinks are probably carcinogen­ic, Loomis said that’s based on studies conducted in countries where tea and maté are consumed at temperatur­es around 70 C, or about 10 degrees hotter than people in North America and Europe “typically want their tea or coffee,” he said.

Jack Siemiatyck­i, a prominent cancer epidemiolo­gist at the University of Montreal, said IARC decisions aren’t taken as gospel by the scientific community.

“They are taken as the opinions of 20 or 25 people who gathered for a week in Lyon (who) looked at the evidence and interprete­d it one way,” he said.

 ??  ??
 ?? SIPHIWE SIBEKO / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ??
SIPHIWE SIBEKO / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada