National Post

Low interest rates aren’t working

- Mark Gilbert Bloomberg News

In most walks of life, it’s pretty obvious that if what you’re doing isn’t working, you should try something else. In the world of central banking, however, the strategy has been to do more of what isn’t working, providing trillions of dollars and euros of liquidity via quantitati­ve easing and even sending official interest rates in some countries into negative territory.

But what if low interest rates are the problem, not the solution? What if the continuous central- bank efforts to add more stimulus end up suggesting that the economic outlook is so bleak that nobody in their right mind would take advantage of the largesse?

In December, the Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate for the first time since 2006 and suggested that the move would be followed by four more increases this year. Instead, it’ s almost the middle of the year, and the futures market is betting the Fed is more likely to remain inactive for the next six months than raise again. “This mismatch between what we’re saying and what we’re doing is arguably caus- i ng distortion­s in global financial market pricing, causing unnecessar­y confusion for future Fed policy and eroding credibilit­y,” St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said last week.

One big problem with artificial­ly engineerin­g low borrowing costs is that capital can end up trapped in so-called zombie companies. What the economist Joseph Schumpeter called “creative destructio­n” is less likely when money is free. That prevents economic Darwinism from weeding out the weak.

Citigroup’s Gregory Marks published a research note last week slamming central bankers for acting like doctors allowed to “perform experiment­al procedures on everyone who walks through hospital doors.” He cited Rudolf von Havenstein, who was president of the German central bank when the country was gripped by hyperinfla­tion between 1921 and 1923, in large part because he printed money with no regard for the inflationa­ry consequenc­es. His name has become synonymous with muddled monetary thinking ( one of the funniest market Twitter feeds around bears his name).

“We should be invoking Havenstein to identify the present flaw in institutio­nal thinking around current monetary policy, specifical­ly negative rates,” Marks wrote. “In other words, the lesson here is that, unfortunat­ely, people believed in the efficacy of a completely irrational policy because it was put in place by a qualified and experience­d policymake­r — this instead of questionin­g the common sense merit of its possible outcome.

And in a research report published earlier this month with the title “The ECB Must Change Course,” Deutsche Bank’s chief internatio­nal economist, Torsten Slok, argued that the eurozone central bank should prepare to reverse its policy stance. “The longer policy prevents the necessary catharsis, the more it contribute­s to the growth of populist or extremist politics,” Slok argues. “Normalizin­g rates would be seen as a positive signal by consumers and corporate investors. The longer the ECB persists with unconventi­onal monetary policy, the greater the damage to the European project will be.”

If central banks ( and indeed financial markets) are telling the world that money will be free for the foreseeabl­e future, what incentive do consumers or companies have to borrow today to consume or invest, rather than waiting a while to see if demand picks up? Suppose instead there was a co- ordinated announceme­nt that interest rates in the world’s major economies would rise to, say, two per cent in three months’ time. Might that not grease the wheels of industry, prompting companies to borrow to invest?

In December, when the Fed raised rates, I argued that it shouldn’t have. Based on economic orthodoxy, I stand by that call. But I’m willing to entertain the possibilit­y that it’s time to rip up the textbooks and try some financial heterodoxy. If lower borrowing costs haven’t revived growth or extinguish­ed the threat of deflation, maybe it’s time to give higher interest rates a chance.

THE CENTRALBAN­K MESSAGE IS THAT MONEY WILL CONTINUE TO BE FREE.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada