National Post

DUMPING THE NOMINEE

-

No one should expect anything less, this U.S. presidenti­al election, than a dramatic standoff over Donald Trump and his place in the Republican Party that nominated him. As Republican leaders distance themselves from their controvers­ial presidenti­al nominee, some pressing him to withdraw, it has sent pundits, academics and political junkies raking through history books, party rules, the constituti­on, election laws and whatif fantasies looking for an answer to how do you solve a problem like Donald? The short answer? Not easily; no presidenti­al candidate for either party has ever been replaced after securing the nomination. That hasn’t stemmed the flow of some ideas, as the National Post’s Adrian Humphreys reports.

1. GET TRUMP TO QUIT

Early fury over Trump’s remarks led some to hope Trump might withdraw from the race of his own accord. Many expected this each step of his would-be path to the White House.

It is increasing­ly unlikely. The bombastic candidate himself vowed, in all capital letters, to continue fullsteam ahead, saying “I WILL NEVER DROP OUT OF THE RACE, WILL NEVER LET MY SUPPORTERS DOWN,” on Twitter. He added his battle with his own party’s leadership allows him to finish the campaign without interferen­ce: “It is so nice that the shackles have been taken off me and I can now fight for America the way I want to.”

Hope of a graceful Trump exit seems hopeless.

2. REPUBLICAN­S FORCE HIM OUT

Searching the GOP rules for a way to remove Trump, most pundits look to Rule 9 or Rule 12. Rule 9 allows the Republican National Committee to replace a vacancy in the case of “death, declinatio­n, or otherwise.”

Richard Hasen, a leading expert on U.S. election law, says this is a non-starter: “The Republican Party’s rules do not provide an easy path to replacing a candidate on the ballot who hasn’t withdrawn or died or become incapacita­ted. The rules provide for the RNC to fill a vacancy. If Trump doesn’t withdraw, then there is no vacancy.”

Rule 12, though, says the RNC can amend its rules, but time is prohibitiv­e, said Josh Putnam, a lecturer in the Department of Political Science at the University of Georgia.

“There just isn’t enough time to pull it off,” said Putnam. “It isn’t that the RNC can’t, it is that there isn’t time.” There are rules on notice for such a motion and lag time before changes take effect. The RNC would also have to agree on an alternativ­e, which looks difficult in a divisive environmen­t. The ballots with Trump’s name have already been printed in many states and early voting has begun. It would also really upset Trump’s supporters, said Hasen. “Many members of the Republican base still support Donald Trump and if the Republican National Committee, when you have maybe two-thirds of Republican core voters who don’t want them to, they are going to face a terrible wrath. So they’re not going to do it.”

3. AN ELECTORAL COLLEGE REBELLION

Under the U.S. constituti­on, voters on election day are not technicall­y electing the next president of the United States, they are electing members of the Electoral College, who in turn cast their ballots for their state. They’re supposed to reflect how their state voted. But what if they ignored that expectatio­n? It’s called “faithless electors.” If Trump wins enough states to equal the needed 270 Electoral College majority, could the electors in those states then place their votes for someone else? Not Hillary Clinton, that would be beyond fantasy, but for another GOP option, such as former candidate Mitt Romney, or vice-presidenti­al candidate Mike Pence? Technicall­y it could happen, but it won’t, say experts. Some states have laws against it, and not everyone in the party is abandoning Trump — he has strong grassroots support; it is also hard to imagine such a bold, across-the-board declaratio­n for the same alternate candidate.

4. STARVE HIM OUT

Campaigns run on money and there now seems a move by some Republican­s to move their money elsewhere. “They can starve him for money; that seems to be what they are at least contemplat­ing doing,” said Hasen. “To cut your losses and keep the House and Senate. Right now, the betting is very high that Trump loses. It is reasonably high that if Trump loses badly that the Senate is going to go Democratic, and if it goes terribly, the Republican­s can lose the House. So I think they are in full damage-control mode.” Republican leaders are eyeing the battles downstream. But if Trump’s brilliant business deals and extravagan­t bankroll are to be believed, then there have been few other candidates who could carry on without the party’s financial support. If it doesn’t prompt him to withdraw, it might help bring about the last — most likely — scenario.

5. LEAVE IT TO THE VOTERS

Democracy will likely settle the issue all on its own. “I don’t expect any of this to happen,” said Hasen of the various scenarios. “I don’t expect Trump to withdraw. I don’t expect the RNC to try to replace him if he doesn’t withdraw. I expect Hillary Clinton to get a majority in the electoral college.”

I DON’T EXPECT ANY OF (THESE SCENARIOS) TO HAPPEN. I DON’T EXPECT TRUMP TO WITHDRAW. I DON’T EXPECT THE RNC TO TRY TO REPLACE HIM. I EXPECT HILLARY CLINTON TO GET A MAJORITY IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE. — ELECTION EXPERT RICHARD HASEN

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada