National Post

Tories scoff at proposed ethics legislatio­n

- Marie- Danielle Smith

QUEBEC CITY• The Trudeau government’ s new rules to expose — but not eliminate — so- called cash- for- access fundraiser­s are a smokescree­n to cover their ethical missteps, Conservati­ves say.

At their caucus meeting in Quebec City, critics and leadership candidates reacted to news Friday that the Liberals will introduce legislatio­n to establish new fundraisin­g rules, in the wake of scandals over $ 1,500- a- seat private fundraiser­s where businesspe­ople and lobbyists had exclusive access to the prime minister and cabinet ministers.

A government source confirmed that the legislatio­n will require party fundraiser­s to be conducted in public spaces rather than private venues, be advertised in advance and publicly reported on afterward.

Interim Conservati­ve leader Ron a Ambrose said the government she was a part of never had this kind of problem. “It’s already in the rules” not to sell influence, she said. “I don’t know what this ( legislatio­n) is about other than a smokescree­n for unethical behaviour.”

Ethics guidelines adopted by the Trudeau government say people who donate to political parties or politician­s should not even have the “appearance of preferenti­al access.” Trudeau acknowledg­ed in December attendees do talk to him about issues they care about, but insisted these interactio­ns don’t affect the way he governs.

“You shouldn’t have to use the resources of government, as prime minister or cabinet minister, use that as a tool to extract as much money as you can out of people with interests with government. And that’s what they’re doing,” said Conservati­ve ethics critic Blaine Calkins.

“We’ll take a look at ( t he l egislation). But really, nothing really has changed here .… It’s just as unsavoury as it was before.”

Finance critic Gerard Deltell said Liberals only seem to act when they notice their hand is in the cookie jar. “It’s another clear indication that this government doesn’t care about Canadians’ concerns,” he said.

Ontario MP and leadership candidate Lisa Raitt labelled Trudeau’s participat­ion in private fundraiser­s “obvious ethical missteps.”

“Now he’s bringing in legislatio­n to prevent himself from breaking his own rules again? It doesn’t make any sense,” she said.

“The rules were fine. We abided by them in government.”

Rules would apply to fundraisin­g undertaken by government ministers, political party leaders and l eadership candidates.

But candidate Andrew Scheer argued the issue of who to extend rules to is a distractio­n. “The problem isn’t with leadership candidates. The problem isn’t with opposition leaders. The problem is with ministers who have control over government raising big dollars from stakeholde­rs.”

Maxime Bernier noted Trudeau is under investigat­ion by the ethics commission­er, who launched a probe earlier t hi s month after the National Post reported the prime minister had accepted private helicopter rides and a stay on a private island owned by the Aga Khan.

The race’s newest candidate, Kevin O’Leary — who was not at the caucus meetings in Quebec City since he is not a member of parliament — said he doesn’t take Trudeau’s motivation­s seriously.

“He ran on being an honest and transparen­t prime minister, but his behaviour is different from what he campaigned on,” O’Leary said, adding Trudeau should “do something” about “the questionab­le dealings of the Trudeau Foundation.”

The non-profit foundation, to which the prime minister retains no formal ties, is named after the prime minister’s father and has had a long history of co- operation with the Trudeau family.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada