Aggressive driving may demand stronger penalties
Rise in fatalities has Ontario eyeing new law
Ontario Provincial Police just came off a winter with 14- yearrecord- high 24 snowmobile deaths. And now, with summer officially here, they’re posting more record- setting fatality counts on our roads and bracing themselves for a long season of carnage.
Police break down crash statistics into the Big Four: distracted driving, speed, seatbelt usage and alcohol and drugs. So far for 2017, they’re stunned to report an 80 per cent increase over last year in a category that seems to want to bully its way into the big leagues: aggressive driving.
OPP reported: “65 people died in OPP- investigated collisions last year (2016) in which an inattentive driver was either a contributing factor or the primary cause of the death. In comparison to the other Big Four categories, 2016 ended with 55 speed-related, 53 seatbelt-related and 45 alcohol-related deaths.”
That would make distracted driving — hey you, put down the phone — the big one. But current numbers have police scrambling to contain a growing phenomenon: aggressive drivers. Up from 15 fatalities all of last year to 27 just to this date, police are quick to point out we haven’t officially entered summer, the dangerous, silly season of people driving over their skill levels.
Back in April, a passel of exotic high- end cars were nabbed off Highway 400 in Ontario. The news flashed images of Mercedes, Ferraris, Porsches and Lamborghinis, among others. Stunt driving charges were laid against a dozen drivers, meaning the bucket- list machinery was towed away on flatbeds, their owners grounded and now beginning a circ uitous r omp through the court system to sort out the charges.
Owners cried foul; police cried fair. News reports say it was surrounding motorists who made multiple calls, and police say dash- cam footage and reports will back them up.
Were they targeted? As I tell my kids whenever I’m driving one of those cars, of course you’re targeted. You might as well paint a neon bull’s- eye on your car. You didn’t buy that car so you could, you know, blend in. I’ve also met more than one owner in the category who considers the cost of speeding tickets as the cost of doing business. The rich are different from you and me.
In 2007, when Ontario introduced its so-called Stunt Driving law, the idea was to give police teeth to round up the street racers, the brats who embraced the aftermarket parts bin like a dog on a bone and then turned our roadways into danger zones for everybody else.
The punishment seemed onerous enough. Police could be j udge and j ury at the roadside, immediately seizing the car and suspending a licence. The charge would then wend its way through court, and could result in fines between $ 2,000 and $ 10,000, up to six months in jail and f urther l i cence s uspensions between two and 10 years. Everybody knew going 50 km/ h over the limit could result in the charge; but it also highlighted the dangerous nonsense that is indeed ‘ stuntish’: driving with people in your trunk, turning left in front of a line of traffic to jump the light, weaving in and out of traffic, among other things.
It was supposed to stop the idiots, and yet here we are with an 80 per cent increase in fatalities in early June.
Bill 213, a private member’s bill from Ontario Tourism Minister Eleanor McMahon, seeks to toughen up the fines and jail terms. McMahon is the right person to shepherd this through the wickets; her husband, OPP Sgt. Greg Stobbart, was killed while he was cycling by a driver with five convictions for driving under suspension.
Making our roads safer is going to necessarily fall to politicians if drivers themselves seem unable, or unwilling, to cut the crap.
Over the years, I get wellmeaning but off- centre letters from readers asking why cars are even made that can go more than 100 km/ hr. They are written in earnest: Why do we need vehicles that are able to go faster than any posted speed limit?
I sigh, and not just because of simplistic thinking. People will manage to break any law and endanger themselves in new and improved ways no matter the vehicle, and no matter the punishment. The downside isn’t that dangerous drivers kill themselves, it’s that they take the rest of us out with them.
I don’t know that stiffer fines and jail times will ever deter the most hardcore Ricky Racers. But short of doing what those readers have asked for — putting lawn- mower engines into cars — I don’t see any other answer.