National Post

So, exactly how repulsive was Lyndon B. Johnson? He was horrid enough that the way he said things was almost as bad as what he said. Anyone who came into contact with him was at risk of encounteri­ng a spectacle of burping, farting, nose-picking and crotch

HOW JOHNSON GOT AWAY WITH HIS BEHAVIOUR FOR SO LONG WAS COMPLICATE­D, BUT DISTRACTIO­N HELPED.

- — Scott Van Wynsberghe,

As the world awaits the next nasty utterance f rom Donald Trump, one can only marvel at how history itself has ended up in ( language alert!) — a “shithole.” Amid the chronic shock and horrified reactions, people have become blind to the fact that he is not ( yet) the most disgusting U. S. president in living memory. That title actually belongs to a Texan Democrat, Lyndon B. Johnson, a howling, flatulent tormentor of women whose cussing and racism remain breathtaki­ng today. And if you’re offended by Trump’s level of vulgarity, you really — really — don’t want to read any further.

How Johnson got away with his behaviour for so long was complicate­d, but distractio­n helped. The very way he attained power — by succeeding the slain John F. Kennedy — caused some critics ( notably writer Robert Sherrill and activist Barbara Garson) to focus scornfully on that. The agony of the Vietnam War likewise diverted attention.

But Johnson was also an intense networker, and he succeeded in cultivatin­g or otherwise entangling several prominent journalist­s, including Walter Lippmann and Drew Pearson, as well as Washington Post owner Katharine Graham. According to biographer­s Ronald Steel and Oliver Pilat, plus Graham’s own 1997 memoir, these personal ties undermined a lot of objectivit­y in the press.

Indeed, numerous Washington insiders — reporters, officials, cronies — did not reveal their knowledge of Johnson’s ugly side until 1980, when oral biographer Merle Miller coaxed them. Later biographer­s, including Robert A. Caro, Robert Dallek, and Randall B. Woods, have added to the revelation­s.

As well, it was not widely known for years that Johnson had a recording system in the Oval Office. This system, like the more infamous one of Richard Nixon, captured many very regrettabl­e comments, but it would not be definitive­ly described until a 1999 book by historian William Doyle. ( Transcript­s of the recordings were edited and released through historian Michael R. Beschloss beginning in the late 1990s.)

Finally, one reaction to Johnson’s coarse language was a tendency to sanitize the public record. British journalist Henry Brandon has recalled how the Washington Post rendered “bullshit” as “bull.”

So, exactly how repulsive was Johnson? He was horrid enough that the way he said things was almost as bad as what he said. Anyone who came into contact with him was at risk of encounteri­ng a spectacle of burping, farting, nose- picking and crotch-scratching. Congressma­n Richard Bolling, who witnessed some of this, told Merle Miller: “I wouldn’t say Johnson was vulgar — he was barnyard.” Worse, Johnson had no sense of personal space and treated conversati­on as a creepy hands-on affair. Miller learned from Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee that, “You really felt as if a St. Bernard had licked your face for an hour, had pawed you all over.”

For women, t he ordeal was even worse, and Bradlee claimed that Johnson groped Katharine Graham and was “bumping” up against t he breasts of Washington Post writer Meg Greenfield. (In her memoir, Graham says nothing of this and is suspicious­ly quiet about almost all of Johnson’s peculiarit­ies. She does admit he kissed her on the cheek at least once.)

A truly unlucky few even got to see Johnson relieve himself. Reporter Sam Schaffer toured Johnson’s Texan ranch and was stunned when Johnson urinated right in front of him, in the open. Arthur Goldschmid­t, a friend and United Nations official, was in the Oval Office with Johnson when the latter suddenly headed for the washroom, “took a crap, then shaved and showered, all the while continuing his conversati­on as though what he was doing was the most normal thing in the world.”

As for what Johnson was actually saying during all the above, he was known for folksy aphorisms that were crude, sometimes racist, and often weird, including “it was raining as hard as a cat pissing on a flat rock,” “as straight as an Indian shits,” and the importance of fighting an opponent “till he’s shitty as a bear.” These became more disturbing in his retirement years, when UPI reporter Bill Theis was told by him that subsequent White House economic policies were “the worst thing that’s happened to this country since pantyhose ruined finger-fucking.” ( That quote apparently was passed around as insider gossip until it got to Miller via Richard Bolling.)

The pantyhose bit was part of a troubling pattern. Biographer Woods learned that Johnson would tell close friends that his own wife, the delightful­ly named Lady Bird, was “the best piece of ass I ever had” ( but he still cheated on her). Recorded Oval Office telephone conversati­ons include a 1964 exchange with staffer Ralph Dungan concerning female appointees to government positions. Johnson kept asking Dungan about their looks. Former staffer Yolanda Boozer told Miller that Johnson would comment if female White House employees gained any weight, provoking anxious dieting.

Regardless of gender, Johnson’s treatment of subordinat­es could be appalling. In one of her very rare confirmati­ons of Johnson’s behaviour, Katharine Graham says she saw Johnson apoplectic­ally yelling at aide Jack Valenti over some mistake. She describes the tirade as “callous and inhuman.” A senior adviser, James H. Rowe Jr., reportedly quit after witnessing a similar incident. Johnson’s own vice president, Hubert Humphrey, informed Miller that Johnson’s need to control people caused him to say of certain individual­s that, “I’ve got his pecker in my pocket.”

And then there was the Nword. Although Johnson styled himself as a civil rights crusader and did make progress on race relations, he still presided over a United States torn by racial violence. His public and private statements showed that he never realized he himself may have been part of the problem. For example, Robert A. Caro says he referred to the manual labour of his youth as “n----r work.”

A recorded 1964 telephone conversati­on with the hapless Jack Valenti touched on Johnson’s electoral chances in Texas for an upcoming presidenti­al race: “I think I can take every Mexican in the state and every n----r in the state.” Several weeks before that presidenti­al vote, Johnson spoke before a New Orleans crowd about how Southern politician­s constantly twisted all issues towards race. That was a valid point, but then the speech became strange: “All they ( the voters) ever hear at election time is n---- r, n---- r, n---- r!” Woods discovered that somebody sanitized the official record of the speech, substituti­ng the word “Negro,” but witnesses confirmed what was really said. Robert Dallek learned of a 1967 meeting in the Oval Office with Texan state official Larry Temple, concerning possible black candidates for the Supreme Court. Johnson stressed he would consider only high-profile people: “When I appoint a n----r to the bench, I want everyone to know he’s a n----r.”

Unsurprisi­ngly, when black rioting erupted in Los Angeles in 1965, Johnson was bewildered, and he confided to aide Joseph Califano his fear that “Negroes will end up pissing in the aisles of the Senate.”

In the end, however, it was the uncontroll­able Vietnam War that destroyed Johnson’s administra­tion and wrecked his legacy. William Doyle unearthed a fitting quote from a moment in mid- 1965, when Johnson was moodily strolling on the grounds of the White House, cursing: “I don’t know what the fuck to do about Vietnam.”

Top that, Trump.

‘I WOULDN’T SAY JOHNSON WAS VULGAR — HE WAS BARNYARD.’

 ?? GEORGE TAMES / THE NEW YORK TIMES FILES ?? Regardless of gender, Lyndon Johnson’s treatment of subordinat­es could be appalling, writes Scott Van Wynsberghe.
GEORGE TAMES / THE NEW YORK TIMES FILES Regardless of gender, Lyndon Johnson’s treatment of subordinat­es could be appalling, writes Scott Van Wynsberghe.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada