Blowouts big issue at the Scotties
Michelle Englot offered some frank advice to those fretting over some of the inflated scores at the Scotties Tournament of Hearts.
“They all need to chill out,” the Team Canada skip said in response to comments about the one- sided results at the Canadian women’s curling championship.
“Cut them a break because they are here trying their very best and trying to grow the sport in their province. It’s good for the sport.”
It might be down the road, but right now it can be painful to watch with some of the weaker teams barely keeping up with stronger competition.
The reason is tied to Curling Canada’s 14 member associations wanting to have true national champions.
To accomplish that, the member associations voted that all provincial and territorial champions would compete in the Brier and Scotties. Thus the Yukon and Nunavut were added to the field at the national events.
To accommodate the new representatives, the fields were expanded f rom 12 teams to 16. At the Scotties, one spot was awarded to Team Canada and the other to the winner of Friday’s wild-card game between the top two teams in the Canadian Team Ranking System that didn’t qualify for the national championship.
The Scotties’ main draw began Saturday with the possibility of less competitive teams being blown out by more experienced squads. That happened Sunday when Manitoba’s Jennifer Jones thumped Chelsea Duncan of the Yukon 14-1 in six ends, two fewer than the mandated eight because the game was so out of hand. On Tuesday, Alberta’s Casey Scheidegger rolled past Nunavut’s Amie Shackleton 11-4.
Nolan Thiessen, a threetime Brier winner and former world champion, is Curling Canada’s liaison between the high- performance athletes and Curling Canada’s staff.
Once it was understood the member associations weren’t going to budge on having 14 provincial or territorial representatives at the national events, Thiessen formed a committee that was tasked with creating a new format. That led to the current arrangement being used at the Scotties and Brier.
“A lot of people are going to complain about the format and there not being good games,” Thiessen said. “Is that a function of the format or is that a function of the member associations’ commitment to high- performance curling?
“It’s up to the member associations to create strong reps as well. Curling Canada is responsible for the national team program and if the provinces produce strong teams, it doesn’t look like this.”
It’s asking a lot for Nunavut and the Yukon to produce competitive t eams in just the first year of the project. Englot, however, believes people have to be willing to look at the long- term impact of the changes.
“It’s good for a team like Nunavut to be here and to encourage young girls there to play,” Englot said.
“They have a young girl at third who throws a really good rock. Maybe they will get more curlers out to play and that’s what the sport is all about. It’s building the sport at the grassroots level. It’s not a bad idea to give them a chance to play against teams like ours, so they can see the strategy and improve on their game.”
That entails suffering through some of the blowouts in t he preliminary robin. Thiessen expects the championship r ound — which features the top four teams from each pool — to be more competitive.
“There are going to be four really good games on the ice at the same time,” Thiessen said. “It just compresses everything into the second half of the week.”
Scheidegger expected there to be a disparity between some of the teams.
“That’s the reality of having an event like this,” the Alberta skip said. “I don’t know what the best way is and I feel for Curling Canada for having to figure this out. There are many options that you can do.
“I like the wild-card option because it gets another strong team playing for the national title. I don’t know what the best way is because I don’t work for Curling Canada and I’ll just go with the flow.”