National Post

Exxon ordered to comply with Mass. climate probe

- ALANNA DURKIN RICHER

BOSTON • Exxon Mobil

Corp. must hand over documents related to a state investigat­ion into whether the company misled investors and consumers about what it knew about the link between fossil fuels and climate change, Massachuse­tts’ highest court ruled Friday.

The Supreme Judicial Court rejected Exxon Mobil’s attempt to stymie AttorneyGe­neral Maura Healey’s probe into whether it concealed informatio­n about the impact of climate change from the public.

“Now Exxon must come forward with the truth, what it knew about climate change, when, and what it told the world,” the Democratic attorney general said in a statement. “The people of Massachuse­tts — and people everywhere — deserve answers.”

An Exxon spokesman said the company is evaluating the court’s ruling and considerin­g its next steps.

The ruling is the second blow to the Irving, Tex.based oil and gas giant in the last month.

A federal judge in March dismissed the company’s lawsuit aimed at stopping Healey’s investigat­ion and a similar probe that’s being conducted by New York Attorney-General Eric Schneiderm­an.

The judge in that case described Exxon’s lawsuit as “running roughshod over the adage that the best defence is a good offence.”

The company has said that the two attorneys-general “are incapable of impartial investigat­ions and are attempting to silence political opponents who disagree on the appropriat­e policies to address climate change.”

Massachuse­tts’ high court ruling upholds a lower court decision ordering Exxon to comply with Healey’s investigat­ion.

The court rejected Exxon’s argument that the attorneyge­neral should be disqualifi­ed from the investigat­ion because of comments she made that Exxon says show bias against the company. The court said Healey’s comments showed no “actionable bias.”

“As an elected official, it is reasonable that she routinely informs her constituen­ts of the nature of her investigat­ions,” the court said.

Exxon had also argued that Massachuse­tts lacks jurisdicti­on because the company does not have a corporate presence in the state.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada