National Post

Dairy cartel has politician­s in its pocket.

- Morris W. Dorosh Morris W. Dorosh is publisher of AGRIWEEK, a newsletter for agribusine­ss executives published in Winnipeg since 1967.

Few if any lobby and pressure groups in Canadian history have had as many politician­s in their pocket at one time as the supply management community. Under unpreceden­ted assault for their monopolist­ic and import-eliminatin­g features, the dairy and poultry boards have all parties foursquare behind them.

The Liberal party is beholden to rural Quebec voters, where the marketing board system makes families who milk 50 cows affluent. The affinity of Liberals and French residents of the Quebec backwoods predates Confederat­ion, except for times when separatism is in cyclical ascent. Supply management is merely another way to buy off Quebec voters, which is what they seem to expect.

But why do the NDP and Conservati­ve parties support this system with such passionate fervour?

Supply management is not free enterprise or entreprene­urship, so how does it fit with the philosophy of an allegedly conservati­ve party? The marketing board system is labour unionism transferre­d into the country, except that no labour union has unilateral government sanction to do as it pleases. It does not have the support of all Conservati­ve members, but woe unto him who disrespect­s the party line. Quebec Conservati­ve MP Maxime Bernier, who may be the only conservati­ve in the Conservati­ve caucus, was expelled from Scheer’s shadow cabinet last week after posting on his website the chapter of his forthcomin­g book that criticizes supply management. He lost to Scheer at last year’s Conservati­ve leadership convention by such a microscopi­c margin that there should have been a recount or another vote, and in the book Bernier describes how Quebec and Ontario dairy farmers took out impromptu Conservati­ve party membership­s specifical­ly to vote against him.

It is the expected thing to find incoherenc­e in the New Democratic Party. But supply management is a point on which official party policy literally sides with the rich against the poor. There are 12,000 dairy farmers in Canada economical­ly sheltered by the marketing boards and around 12 million consumers with sub-middle-class incomes, including 4.8 million living below the official poverty line. The Canada West Foundation estimates that dairy and chicken purchases for an average Canadian household cost $600 a year more than the average American household. This $50-a-month burden falls hardest on those with the lowest incomes, advocating for whom is assumed to be the reason that the NDP exists. The NDP places millionair­e dairy farmers in the same class as union labourers. Dairy farms that have hired labour must be the only class of employers that the NDP is not sworn to victimize.

It would be another matter if the supply management system were a template that could be applied across the whole economy and society. But it can’t, not in a market economy or a free society. Supply-management farmers are on an artificial island of prosperity unavailabl­e to any other. It is not accidental that the supply-management principle has not been applied to any new sector in at least 65 years. The dairy and poultry people found that surrenderi­ng the right to produce in exchange for the right to set their own prices was a great bargain, especially as the value of quotas that confer the right to produce exploded.

So the entire Canadian political establishm­ent stands, like Horatius at the bridge, ready to fight to the death any foreign attacker of this rotten system. All the politician­s (except apparently Bernier) are so pledged to the marketing board system that it can only be concluded that a trade agreement such as a renewed NAFTA would be rejected if it required dismantlin­g of the supply-management monopoly. The milkand-feather lobby expects nothing less and as far as it is concerned the 99 per cent of the non-supply-managed economy can go to hell.

Just before the G7 meeting, Trudeau visited a Quebec dairy farm where some farmers had gathered, claiming his stalwart defence of supply management as the reason for the tweet attacks from Trump. However the farmers eventually jeered the prime minister for reportedly offering to be “flexible” on dairy tariffs. The minimum position of the milk lobby is that there is to be no change whatever.

The milk-egg-chicken cartel wants us to believe that it cannot compete with producers in other countries, while Canadian grain, oilseed, cattle hog and other farmers are exposed to world prices all the time. The impression it leaves, as the monopoly attracts rare general media attention, is that dairy and poultry farmers do not feel like competing with anyone. As long as the entire political establishm­ent is with them, why should they?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada