National Post

ELECTION Q&A

-

N.B. Liberal Leader Brian Gallant wants to form a government — even though his party won 21 seats to the Progressiv­e Conservati­ves 22 (with three seats each for the Greens and the People’s Alliance.) Gallant pledged that if he loses the confidence of the House, he would step aside and allow Tory Leader Blaine Higgs to lead — or trigger another election. Still, many questions remain about how New Brunswick’s political future will unfold after voters turned their backs on the province’s entrenched two-party system and put the balance of power in two smaller parties. Brett Bundale reports.

HOW IS IT THAT GALLANT GETS A CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT, EVEN IF HE HAS FEWER SEATS?

In a parliament­ary system, the convention is that the existing premier has the first opportunit­y to form government. “The incumbent premier can always test the legislatur­e,” explains Kelly Lamrock, a Fredericto­n constituti­onal lawyer and former Liberal cabinet minister and House leader. “Theoretica­lly, in 2010 after (then-premier) Shawn Graham lost all but 10 seats he still could have gone to the lieutenant-governor and said, ‘I think I can pull this off,’ and he would have had every right to march into the House and make Conservati­ves turf him.”

HOW AND WHEN WILL HIS ATTEMPT BE TESTED?

The most important principle is that the premier has the confidence of the legislatur­e, says Gabriel Arsenault. “The key test will be the throne speech,” explains the Université de Moncton political science professor. “We’ll have a throne speech and that will lead to a confidence vote and if the government wins the vote that means the government managed to form a coalition or gain the support of the legislativ­e assembly.”

DOES GALLANT’S CLEAR WIN OF THE POPULAR VOTE MATTER?

The short answer is no. “Perhaps it should from a democratic perspectiv­e, but in terms of the rules and convention­s it doesn’t matter,” Arsenault says. “The only thing that matters is the number of seats.” Lamrock says while the popular vote doesn’t matter in a legal sense, it could help the optics of Gallant refusing to back down. The Liberals were six percentage points ahead of the Tories in the popular vote, largely due to staunch support from francophon­e voters in northern New Brunswick. Lamrock suggests that Gallant is trying to signal to the public that rather than “pathetical­ly clinging to power,” more people voted to make him premier than any other leader. The Liberals will want to protect their brand, he says, and winning the popular vote adds credibilit­y to Gallant’s hold on power.

IS THERE A PRECEDENT FOR THIS IN NEW BRUNSWICK?

New Brunswick hasn’t elected a minority government for nearly a hundred years, and this is the first time the party with the most MLAs has so few seats, Arsenault points out. But in 2006 the government of then-premier Bernard Lord found itself unexpected­ly in a minority situation. After the defection of MLA Michael “Tanker” Malley to sit as an independen­t, the Lord government shrewdly appointed him Speaker. Malley would cast the deciding vote on the spring budget, breaking the tie between the 27 Progressiv­e Conservati­ve MLAs and 27 opposition members. “Bernard Lord governed in a 27/27 House for a year with a Speaker in the chair … because the Speaker by custom does not vote to take down a government,” Lamrock says. However, after another Tory MLA indicated he would be leaving caucus, Lord called an early fall election to avoid a minority government.

WOULD PARTY ALLIANCES NEED TO BE EXPLICIT TO CONVINCE THE LIEUTENANT-GOVERNOR THEY CAN GOVERN, OR CAN GALLANT INDEED TRY TO GO VOTE-BY-VOTE?

The lieutenant-governor will look for assurances that the premier will have the confidence of the house. “If you’ve got a signed letter from somebody with three seats saying, ‘I’ve agreed that for 18 months I will not bring down this government on a confidence vote,’ that becomes a powerful inducement,” Lamrock says. Meanwhile, instead of a formal pact to work together for a set period of time, Arsenault says the premier could go “vote-by-vote.” However, he says that’s unstable and could trigger another election — something no one will likely want.

COULD NEW BRUNSWICKE­RS BE BACK AT THE POLLS SOON?

Lamrock says if Gallant loses confidence of the legislativ­e assembly quickly, Higgs will likely have the opportunit­y to form government. But he says if the Liberal leader manages to hold on to power for a year or longer, the loss of a confidence vote at that point would likely trigger an election. The constituti­onal expert pointed to the King-Byng affair, in which the governor-general refused a request by the prime minister to dissolve parliament and call a general election. The crisis prompted the role of governor-general to evolve, adopting a tradition of non-interferen­ce. “Parliament­ary convention is that if a premier falls quickly then the lieutenant-governor should be guided by trying to avoid an election and trying to make the people’s will work, such as calling in a second option,” Lamrock says. “But if it goes over a year, the custom would be if the premier comes out and says I’m about to lose a vote, I want an election, generally the lieutenant-governor is obligated to let him call it.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada