National Post

The ‘toxic’ women who are derailing #MeToo movement

- BARBARA KAY

According to a survey in the latest Economist magazine, the effect of the #MeToo movement has been to elevate Americans’ skepticism over sympathy for victims. Among other findings, the survey notes that between November 2017 and September 2018, while the perception that false allegation­s of sexual assault are a greater problem than unreported or unpunished sexual assault remains a minority, it neverthele­ss rose among both men and women in all categories surveyed — even among Hillary Clinton supporters. The poll, conducted by YouGov, found that “18 per cent of Americans now think that false accusation­s of sexual assault are a bigger problem than attacks that go unreported or unpunished, compared with 13 per cent in November last year,” the Economist reports.

The Kavanaugh-Ford Senate hearings cannot be the sole cause for these elevated numbers, but likely contribute­d to them. It is one thing to see full justice done to abusers like Bill Cosby with a longtime, well-supported pattern of predatory behaviour; it’s quite another to see a deeply vetted Supreme Court appointee come perilously close to profession­al disaster and a lifetime proscripti­on against coaching girls’ basketball on the basis of one woman’s uncorrobor­ated 36-year-old memory.

Another contributi­ng factor to the cooling of sympathy for accusers must surely be the licence given by the #MeToo movement to air venomous screeds against all men in the mainstream media.

In June, The Washington Post published a diatribe against men, with the provocativ­e title, “Why can’t we hate men?” by women’s studies professor Suzanna Danuta Walters. In it she catalogues the crimes of “toxic masculinit­y”: sexual violence, terrorism, mansplaini­ng, unequal wages, etc. For Walters, all women are vulnerable, all men are a risk to them.

Last week, the Post facilitate­d more toxic misandry. In another op-ed blast, “Thanks for not raping us, all you ‘good men,’ But it’s not enough,” retired history professor Victoria Bissell Brown recounts highlights from the demonizing tirade she delivered to one man, meant to represent all men, as a means of venting her frustratio­n with women’s ongoing victimhood.

Trouble is, the vessel for Brown’s load of verbal spewing is her husband of 50 years — “one of the good men,” who “(doesn’t) hit women or rape women or in any way abuse women,” who has “applauded and funded feminism for a half-century” — who she sets up as the prisoner in the dock for a gender show trial.

Brown tells us she yelled for 30 minutes at this poor schlemazel, who “sat, hunched and hurt,” while “I announced that I hate all men and wish all men were dead.” Being one of the “good men,” he couldn’t yell back at her that she was being unfair, abusive and cruel. To show what a good feminist he was, he had to suck it up, and by her account, he did. Even after she says there is no hope for him because “You can listen all you want, but that will not create one iota of change.”

This sort of publicized mistreatme­nt is going to make a lot of “good men” angry — and a lot of women, too, including normal feminists. Does this woman think her betrayal will leave no scars? She says she is a grandmothe­r. That means she has a son or daughter. Did she not consider the consequenc­es of this juvenile public tantrum for her husband’s standing as a father and grandfathe­r? What did she hope to accomplish here?

Unhinged haters like Brown are helping to foment a backlash against #MeToo. Good men don’t yell back at women; they don’t hit them; they don’t argue with them; they don’t write rebuttal pieces and submit them to The Washington Post. What they are doing is slowly backing away from them. And in meaningful ways.

I have a youngish friend in the financial sector, a senior executive in a large company. In our conversati­ons, I have noted his growing apprehensi­on about #MeToo excesses. He tells me he’s too paranoid now to get into elevators with women if there are no witnesses around, or even have one-on-one meetings with women, because he worries he “could be taken down by any female employee with a frivolous claim of sexual harassment that could ruin my family and my reputation.” For a long time he wanted to hire more women to increase their representa­tion in his field. Now he’s not so sure.

In her article, “Why can’t we hate men?” Suzanna Danuta Walters writes, “The world has little place for feminist anger.” Another false allegation that, along with mere anger, does nothing to improve gender relations.

 ?? BERNSTEIN / BLOOMBERG FILES ?? A demonstrat­or opposed to Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh holds a You Thought We Were Angry Before sign while protesting in Washington, D.C.
BERNSTEIN / BLOOMBERG FILES A demonstrat­or opposed to Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh holds a You Thought We Were Angry Before sign while protesting in Washington, D.C.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada