National Post

Canadian conservati­ves

-

Re: So- cons have a role to play, Charles Lewis, Feb. 7

I want to thank Charles Lewis for his contributi­on to the recent conversati­on about the central role community has played in the story of Canada and Canadian conservati­sm.

He highlights the positive contributi­on conservati­ves can make to the developmen­t of “compassion­ate” social policies that would enrich the lives of all Canadians facing increasing problems complicate­d by the stresses of modern life and exacerbate­d by a culture of individual­ism and isolationi­sm that too often seems to have forgotten the benefits of family and community support in dealing with, and even preventing and solving, problems that end up affecting the entire Canadian community.

In focusing on two of the so- called hot- button issues, abortion and euthanasia, Lewis suggests that Conservati­ves in drafting their new policy directions can find common ground in the idea of compassion­ate communitie­s that offer meaningful support for mothers and excellent palliative care for the sick and the elderly.

I would suggest that the benefit of developing a social policy that focuses on supporting the life and well- being of communitie­s, neighbourh­oods, and families offers a rich perspectiv­e for innovative and exciting policy solutions for most of our country’s current problems including those facing the poor, the infirm, the elderly, refugees, the homeless, and the Indigenous; as well as our relationsh­ip with our global neighbours and the environmen­t, our “common home.”

Compassion­ate social policies that empower the Canadian people to assume some of the responsibi­lity of caring for one another, especially the most vulnerable — from the elderly to the homeless to our environmen­t — would offer a new and powerful vision that could help unite us in this polarized world.

M. T. Murphy, Oakville, Ont.

Re: Make social mobility key Tory causes, Sean Speer, Feb. 8

Over the last several weeks, the National Post has published a series of articles on what conservati­sm should be in Canada. In the meantime, Confederat­ion itself is failing. We have been broken into complainin­g parts in the West and East, each identifyin­g why Confederat­ion is not working for them.

Alberta, restrained by the federal government and Quebec in its attempt to develop and then market its oil and gas in Canada and elsewhere and once a proud contributi­ng partner in Confederat­ion, is fast becoming a beggar in need of a handout. Our Maritime provinces, their GNP suffering from an aging and otherwise shrinking population and neighbouri­ng provincial trade barriers require a new federal vision to survive.

Conservati­ves today have a new opportunit­y to speak powerfully to Confederat­ion, to re-imagine, create, and then, when able, to enforce national policies that will support the aspiration­s of Canada’s constituen­t parts, integratin­g economic needs as originally envisioned by our founders and now desperatel­y required.

But, of course, this would mean a new commitment to a Canada that works for all and the abandoning of the current counter- Confederat­ion agendas of many who seem to care little, if at all, about the ultimate survival of our country.

Can conservati­ve thinkers afford not to take up this challenge today?

Ron Hoffman, Toronto, Ont.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada