National Post

As they have from other crises, cities will rebound from COVID-19.

- Megan Mcardle The Washington Post Twitter. com/asymmetric­info

In the long run, the cities will almost certainly bounce back, because in the long run, the cities always seem to bounce back. No matter how unlikely that may seem at the moment.

Rome endured through centuries of plague and sackings, even though for some time its population diminished to the point where goats were grazed and vineyards planted inside the Aurelian walls. It’s now bigger than ever. Individual cities can fall, or even vanish, but over the course of human history, the city has only grown, despite the prediction­s of countless generation­s of pastoral fantasists.

It tells you something that mankind kept flocking to filthy streets and crowded, unventilat­ed homes for all those centuries before antibiotic­s and sewers. How enormous the benefits of living close by other people must be, and how hard to pass up, especially when those other people are engaged in the same trade that you are.

“When an industry has thus chosen a locality for itself,” wrote the great 19th- century economist Alfred Marshall, “it is likely to stay there long: so great are the advantages which people following the same skilled trade get from near neighbourh­ood to one another. The mysteries of the trade become no mysteries; but are as it were in the air, and children learn many of them unconsciou­sly.”

So be skeptical when people look out over the disasters of this spring and suggest that the 1970s are back and cities are over. Rusticatio­n is harder than it looks.

I’ve always written about both business and public policy, but after I moved from New York to Washington, I noticed that the longer I stayed here, the fuzzier I grew about what exactly was happening on Wall Street — and the more impatient I became with the political naivete of New Yorkers. Until the informatio­n filtering through my social networks changed, I hadn’t even been aware of just how much I was absorbing over cocktail napkins and cappuccino­s. Those interactio­ns are why I still live in Washington, even though we could have bought twice the house at half the cost in some smaller place.

It’s also useful to have personal friends in your industry if you need to change jobs, a phenomenon that is part of what economists call “matching.” Labour matching pins firms in place as firmly as people, which is why big tech is still in Silicon Valley and finance in New York, despite the lure of cheaper real estate elsewhere. The flow of ideas and labour between industries arguably adds even more value, as unexpected connection­s make entirely new things possible. This is why incomes, and productivi­ty, are so much higher in cities than they are in rural areas, and why this differenti­al has grown as the global megacities have expanded.

Sure, the novel coronaviru­s has temporaril­y cancelled the many benefits and amenities of urban agglomerat­ion. It’s also cut the immigratio­n flows that kept services cheap and plentiful for an ever- growing urban profession­al class. Those taps will be hard to reopen as long as the virus remains endemic in the developing world — as it likely will, long after America has quelled the epidemic.

Meanwhile the irritation­s of city living will remain: hell is other people, wrote Sartre, and especially on the crosstown bus. They’re hellacious indeed with a deadly virus running around. Such inconvenie­nces drove the middle class out in mid-century, hastened by rising crime and, yes, the riots. Why shouldn’t we expect to see a second exodus now, when software is making it easier than ever to work where you please?

In the short run, perhaps we will; San Francisco rents dropped nearly 10 per cent in May, after tech giants announced that they’d be making their work-from-home arrangemen­ts permanent. But of course, falling prices make cities more attractive despite declining amenities; that’s why people stayed in Detroit even when the jobs left.

Nor are the problems of the cities quite as dire as they were in the 1960s. Zoom simply isn’t as revolution­ary as the automobile. The car was better than the buggy on almost every dimension. But Zoom strips out vital social cues and skips the casual conversati­ons at the office coffee pot that can spark new ideas or solutions to old problems. It might ultimately augment smaller offices; it is unlikely to substitute for them entirely.

Nonetheles­s, some will no doubt pick up and leave for the immediate future. But eventually the viral threat will most likely fade, either because we all got a vaccine or because we all got COVID-19. Would- be rusticator­s will remember that you still cannot easily drink a cocktail, find a mate, groom a sales prospect or eat a meal over Zoom. And then cities will grow again, as they have over the millennia, despite even more daunting threats than COVID-19 or abusive cops: because what’s there isn’t anywhere else except, maybe, in another city.

CITIES WILL GROW AGAIN, AS THEY HAVE OVER THE MILLENNIA.

 ?? JOHANNES EISELE / AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? New York and other cities hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic will almost certainly bounce back, writes Megan Mcardle.
JOHANNES EISELE / AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES New York and other cities hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic will almost certainly bounce back, writes Megan Mcardle.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada