National Post

Firm isn’t shutting Dakota Access, despite ruling

- RACHEL ADAMS-HEARD, ELLEN GILMER AND JENNIFER A. DLOUHY

Energy Transfer LP said it’s not making any moves to empty its dakota Access oil pipeline after a judge on Monday ordered the conduit shut while a more robust environmen­tal review is conducted.

The dallas-based company run by billionair­e Kelcy Warren said it’s also accepting requests for space on the pipeline in August. The u.s. district Court for the district of Columbia had ordered the pipeline to be drained by Aug. 5.

“We are not shutting in the line,” Energy Transfer spokeswoma­n Vicki Granado said in an email when asked if the company had begun emptying the pipeline. Judge James E. Boasberg “we believe exceeded his authority and does not have the jurisdicti­on to shut down the pipeline or stop the flow of crude oil.”

It’s the latest sign that Energy Transfer is preparing for yet another battle over the dakota Access crude pipeline, which four years ago drew months of on-the-ground protests from environmen­tal groups and Native American tribes opposed to the project’s route across Lake Oahe, a dammed section of the Missouri river just a half-mile from the Standing rock Indian reservatio­n in the dakotas.

“Energy Transfer is playing a very dangerous game,” said Earthjusti­ce lawyer Jan hasselman, who represents the Standing rock Sioux Tribe against dakota Access. “They don’t get to ignore a federal court order just because they disagree with it.”

Energy Transfer’s strategy could reflect optimism the ruling will be reversed on appeal or at least temporaril­y blocked by a higher court.

In Washington, energy lobbyists have mused that the shutdown order would be difficult to enforce, according to three people familiar with the discussion­s.

height Securities LLC also predicts the unpreceden­ted ruling to shut down dakota Access because of a violation of the National Environmen­tal Policy Act is unlikely to withstand review by the d.c. Circuit Court of Appeals, according to a research note for clients.

“The d.c. Circuit case law appears weighted in favour of ET,” especially since cases Boasberg used to justify the decision to shut down dakota Access did not involve active, operating pipelines, height analyst Josh Price said in the note.

When asked whether Energy Transfer plans to defy Boasberg’s decision if it remains in effect Aug. 5, Granado reiterated that the company doesn’t think he has the authority to shut the line. Prices for Bakken crude, produced in North dakota, rose after the news that Energy Transfer planned to keep the line in service.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada