National Post

Better off knowing

-

Re: Put an end to asymptomat­ic testing, Sept. 12

One of the central arguments of this article is that identifyin­g asymptomat­ic testing is problemati­c because it causes unnecessar­y measures, especially quarantine procedures, when patients may no longer be infectious. To suggest we are better off not knowing whether asymptomat­ic people have COVID-19 is absurd. If asymptomat­ic patients really are less infectious, then the problem is with our procedures for dealing with them, not in testing them. The article makes similar arguments around home tests, arguing that people are better off not being allowed to test themselves. The assumption is that having informatio­n about whether one does or does not have COVID-19 will cause people to engage in more risky behaviours than if they did not have this informatio­n. Not only is this an empirical question for which we have no good data, but trying to effect desired behaviours by withholdin­g informatio­n is manipulati­ve and demeaning.

Laurence Ashworth, Associate Professor, Consumer Psychology, Queen’s University

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada