National Post (Latest Edition)

Nominee to face recusal calls

Election looms over pick for U.S. Supreme Court

- Lawrence Hurley

WASHINGTON • Democrats are urging U. S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett to recuse herself from any election-related cases because of President Donald Trump’s comments that he expects the justices to potentiall­y decide the outcome.

Trump on Saturday nominated Barrett to the vacancy created by the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Sept. 18. If confirmed by the Republican-controlled U. S. Senate, Barrett would give the court a 6-3 conservati­ve majority.

On Wednesday Trump said he wanted the full complement of nine justices on the court as soon as possible in part because he believes the court will determine the outcome of the Nov. 3 presidenti­al election.

“I think this will end up in the Supreme Court, and I think it’s very important that we have nine justices,” he told reporters at a White House event.

Trump said on Sunday he hopes Barrett is paying attention to the issue of mail-in ballot security but said he did not discuss the upcoming U.S. presidenti­al election with her.

The Supreme Court has determined the outcome of a U.S. presidenti­al election only once, in 2000, leading President George W. Bush to the White House.

Trump indicated that the Supreme Court would rule in his favour with nine justices on board.

He alleged they would respond to an unspecifie­d “scam that the Democrats are pulling” in relation to increased use of mail-in ballots as a result of the coronaviru­s pandemic.

Trump has repeatedly and controvers­ially attacked unsolicite­d mail-in balloting as being vulnerable to widespread fraud.

Senate Democrats say they will probe Barrett on the subject during her confirmati­on hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the hope she will pledge to step aside in election-related cases.

Democratic Senator Cory Booker, who serves on the committee, said on Sunday he would ask Barrett about recusal when he meets her.

“If she does not recuse herself, I fear that the court will be further delegitimi­zed,” he said on NBC’S Meet the Press.

There are no indication­s Republican senators share those concerns, with Republican Senator Mike Lee, speaking on ABC’S This Week, saying that recusal decisions would be up to Barrett.

During previous Senate hearings, Supreme Court nominees have routinely declined to commit on how they would approach cases that could come before them.

Although U.S. law requires justices to step aside when there is a conflict of interest or genuine question of bias, it leaves the individual justice to decide whether such a conflict exists. In a 2011 report, conservati­ve Chief Justice John Roberts said he had “complete confidence in the capability of my colleagues to determine when recusal is warranted.”

Legal experts told Reuters that under the way the law has been interprete­d up until now, the new justice need not recuse herself from any election issue.

But New York University School of Law legal ethics expert Stephen Gillers noted that should a decisive election issue come before the justice, Democratic candidate Joe Biden could be justified in filing a motion asking her to recuse.

“I believe that would be a persuasive argument in this unique circumstan­ce,” he said.

He noted that in 2000, when the Supreme Court decided the election in favour of Republican Bush, none of the justices were appointed by either candidate, although Democratic candidate Al Gore was vice president to president Bill Clinton, who appointed both Ginsburg and Justice Stephen Breyer.

This time, there would be three justices on the bench appointed by Trump himself.

Both liberal and conservati­ve justices have been pressed by critics in the past to recuse themselves in cases with perceived conflicts. Litigants can file motions seeking recusal but rarely do.

In 2004, the Sierra Club environmen­tal group asked conservati­ve Justice Antonin Scalia to step aside in a case concerning then- vice president Dick Cheney, a friend of the justice. Scalia refused, saying his impartiali­ty could not reasonably be questioned.

During the 2016 presidenti­al race, liberal Ginsburg criticized then- candidate Trump as a “faker,” prompting cries by conservati­ve critics of bias. Ginsburg later expressed regret for her remarks but did not step aside from any case involving Trump.

 ?? Chip Somodevila / Getty Images ?? Judge Amy Coney Barrett speaks after U. S. President Donald Trump announced Saturday that she will be his nominee to the Supreme Court. If confirmed, Coney Barrett would give the court a 6-3 conservati­ve majority, which Trump wants to use to his advantage for potential election cases.
Chip Somodevila / Getty Images Judge Amy Coney Barrett speaks after U. S. President Donald Trump announced Saturday that she will be his nominee to the Supreme Court. If confirmed, Coney Barrett would give the court a 6-3 conservati­ve majority, which Trump wants to use to his advantage for potential election cases.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada