National Post

What have the Liberals got against democracy?

- John Ivison Comment

The Liberals think Canadians should go to the polls rather than their answering several simple questions

— ERIN O’TOLE, LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION

It reads like satire now but five years ago, the Trudeau Liberals were elected on a platform that promised electoral reform; stronger Access to Informatio­n legislatio­n; an end to the use of omnibus bills and prorogatio­n; and, more robust parliament­ary committees that could better hold the government to account.

Having broken the first three pledges, the Liberals are now threatenin­g to provoke a general election over the fourth.

The House of Commons will vote Wednesday on a Conservati­ve motion to create a new special committee that would focus on investigat­ing the WE Charity affair and other alleged scandals.

The Bloc Québécois will back the motion but the NDP is already edging towards another deal with the Liberals. New Democrat MPS like Charlie Angus have said they are comfortabl­e dropping a request for documents focused on the prime minister’s mother and brother, which is at the heart of the government side’s ire.

The Liberals have proposed their own committee to examine COVID spending, albeit one chaired and dominated by their own MPS, and this may prove enough of a face- saving compromise for the NDP to acquiesce.

But Justin Trudeau’s willingnes­s to opt for the nuclear option to avoid answering awkward questions is troubling. This was a government that promised to be open by default.

Did Trudeau perceive his deception back in the summer of 2015, or was he just incredibly naïve?

He was elected saying he would reverse the shift of power and influence from the centre.

But in the eyes of the dean of Canada’s political scientists, Donald Savoie, he has done the opposite.

“Trudeau fils has strengthen­ed the centre of government, rather than rolled it back,” he said in his 2019 book, Democracy in Canada: The Disintegra­tion of Our Institutio­ns.

In this case, Trudeau has taken a sledgehamm­er to the legitimacy that Parliament offers government.

If the Conservati­ve strategy in all this is obvious — go digging for more mud to sling — the Liberal game-plan is less so.

Pablo Rodriguez, the government House leader, feigned synthetic anger when he declared the Conservati­ves’ “dangerous partisan plan to paralyze government” is a matter of confidence.

Yet he said the Liberals are “totally open to give all the informatio­n that is requested from the opposition.”

That will be news to all the MPS who sat through hours of filibuster­ing at committee last week because the Liberals were not prepared to hand over documents.

Rodriguez said MPS cannot establish a new committee “with sweeping powers” and assume there will be no consequenc­es. “If they do that, they are saying that the government is corrupt. And that means that they don’t have confidence in this government,” he said.

Conservati­ve Leader Erin O’toole said that, while he has no confidence in the government’s handling of the WE Charity issue, he does not want an election. Even NDP leader Jagmeet Singh said that the only way there will be an election is if the prime minister chooses to have one.

“Imagine the prime minister trying to explain to people who are worried about their livelihood­s...his reason is because he doesn’t like the committee,” Singh said.

The Liberals have performed the parliament­ary equivalent of putting a butterfly on a torture rack — threatenin­g an election in the middle of pandemic over an opposition motion to set up a committee aimed at keeping the government accountabl­e.

It could be that Trudeau has looked at public opinion polls and decided to take advantage of the pandemic. At a time when one in three people say they would have been destitute without government support, the public mood certainly favours the incumbent Liberals.

But the prime minister risks a backlash at this brazen over-reach, which makes one wonder: What is it he doesn’t want people to know?

I had concluded the WE issue had played itself out with the departure of former finance minister, Bill Morneau, but I may have been premature in that conclusion.

What is clear is that this is a strategy that has been cooked up in the Prime Minister’s Office to spare Trudeau’s blushes over the WE affair. It is a worrying extension of the executive democracy favoured by his predecesso­r, Stephen Harper, where the centre often attempted to reduce the House of Commons to irrelevanc­y. In Trudeau’s eyes, it seems the government runs Parliament, rather than being accountabl­e to it.

Rather than restoring trust in democracy, as the Liberals promised five years ago, they are in danger of stripping it of its authority and dignity.

NEWS TO ALL THE MPS WHO SAT THROUGH HOURS OF FILIBUSTER­ING.

 ?? Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS ??
Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada