National Post

The investment strategy that can help homeowners put their home equity to work.

- Rechtshaff­en, FP6

In our view, if you can match up the cheap borrowing and invest it into secured lending that pays a high rate of return, you are getting close to the security that banks feel when they match GIC s with mortgages. — Ted Rechtshaff­en

Agreat banking strategy for years has been the ability to lock in investors in a fiveyear GIC at a lower rate than the five- year mortgage rate charged to a borrower. Assuming the mortgage is secured, with very little risk, the bank can lock in what was traditiona­lly a one per cent to two per cent profit for five years straight.

Today, interest rates have presented an even better opportunit­y for some individual Canadians.

If you have good credit and income, you can now get a five- year fixed mortgage for less than two per cent.

If you only want to pay interest, you can get a secured line of credit for 2.45 per cent. This may not always require sizable income. In some cases, you can even get an unsecured line of credit for 2.45 per cent if you have solid income and credit.

This is an incredibly low borrowing cost. But if the funds are used to generate taxable income, in most cases, you can deduct the interest costs. If you are in a top tax bracket, that essentiall­y cuts your borrowing cost in half, down to around one per cent to 1.25 per cent.

The question is what can or should you do with access to those funds?

Assuming for the moment that you can access funds at those rates, is there an investment that is appropriat­e to try to match against the borrowing, just like the banks do?

As it turns out, the interest- rate environmen­t has produced two connected opportunit­ies. For individual­s ( especially those with considerab­le home equity), interest rates are exceptiona­lly low. At the same time, many businesses are finding that rates for them have not come down at all. In fact, their borrowing costs in some cases have gone up. How can this be with such low interest rates?

The reason is that the same banks that are lending to individual­s at very low rates secured against houses, are a little spooked by the size of their lending books and their overall exposure to a meaningful downturn in the economy. That, along with something called regulatory risk capital, means banks have been less willing to add lending to small and medium sized businesses. As a result, these businesses have to go elsewhere for funds, and while the going rate may be two per cent on a mortgage, the going rate on secured lending to businesses is often over 10 per cent.

These lending rates create what is sometimes called a barbell, where borrowing costs for individual­s are very far apart from borrowing costs for many businesses.

What is important is that these aren’t particular­ly risky businesses, and those that are lending to them have exceptiona­l security on the loans. As a result, the historical loan losses on these business loans have been extremely low.

This brings us back to the question of what you can or should be doing with this access to cheap money.

In our view, if you can match up the cheap borrowing and invest it into secured lending that pays a high rate of return, you are getting close to the security that banks feel when they match GICS with mortgages.

Fortunatel­y, there are now many options to invest with companies that have very strong risk and operationa­l procedures to lend to businesses. These investment­s have generally had returns for investors in the 6.5 per cent to 8.5 per cent range on a steady basis. We have been using this as part of our investment­s for clients for about seven years. Even in 2020, the returns stayed very much in line with their historical returns.

This investment strategy will not be for everyone. There is some risk here, but meaningful­ly less than borrowing to invest in the stock market. In addition, only some people will have the ability to borrow funds.

One example of how this can potentiall­y be used is to create a new monthly cash flow. In some respects it is like creating rental income without the bother of actually having a tenant.

Here is an example of how it would work.

You own a house worth $ 1.5 million that either has no mortgage or a relatively small mortgage. Using a home equity line of credit at prime, you borrow $500,000 at 2.45 per cent interest. This means that every month you will pay $ 1,021 in taxdeducti­ble interest. The $ 500,000 is invested in a small mix of investment­s primarily focused on secured lending to businesses, that distribute income monthly. If we use a conservati­ve return number of six per cent, that will generate $ 2,500 a month. Each month, $ 2,500 a month goes to your bank account a few days before the $ 1,021 comes out, leaving you with a net monthly cash flow of $ 1,479. This new monthly cash flow is created using something that is otherwise sitting dormant — the equity built up in your home. The $500,000 invested should remain fairly steady, and hopefully will grow slightly if total returns are over six per cent — as they have been in the private credit space for several years.

While everyone’s situation is different, this is certainly one potential opportunit­y for many Canadians to increase their wealth and their cash flow, with relatively low risk.

 ??  ??
 ?? Gett y ?? It’s not a strategy for everyone, but tapping into home equity offers a potential opportunit­y to grow wealth.
Gett y It’s not a strategy for everyone, but tapping into home equity offers a potential opportunit­y to grow wealth.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada