National Post

Biden move marks end of era for mega pipelines.

Stiff opposition has scrapped several plans

- Gerson Freitas Jr., rachel adams-heard ellen Gilmer and

Joe Biden’s move to block the us$9 billion Keystone XL project is the clearest sign yet that constructi­ng a major new pipeline in the u.s. has become an impossible task.

The incoming president has pledged to reshape the u.s. energy sector and accelerate the transition from fossil fuels, and the cancellati­on of the proposed link to Canada’s oilsands will be one of his first big environmen­tal actions.

Even before Biden’s inaugurati­on Wednesday, the oil and gas industry was on its back foot when it came to building major new infrastruc­ture. despite donald Trump’s pro-fossil-fuel policies, energy companies such as Williams Cos. and dominion Energy Inc. have been forced to scrap new projects in the face of stiff opposition.

“I can’t imagine going to my board and saying, ‘we want to build a new greenfield pipeline’,” Williams chief executive Alan Armstrong said in an interview. “I do not think there will be any funding of any big cross-country greenfield pipelines, and I say that because of the amount of money that’s been wasted.”

The industry’s retreat is a victory for the environmen­tal movement. Groups that once campaigned under the slogan Keep It In The Ground have increasing­ly turned their attention to the pipes. Building them in much of the u.s. is a far trickier business than drilling oil and gas wells. That’s due to the numerous federal and state permits that, for the most part, can be more easily litigated. The Trump administra­tion sought to streamline federal permitting, but many projects were dealt a mortal blow in the courts.

“No one is going to announce a new pipeline while Joe Biden is the president,” said Katie Bays, managing director at Fiscalnote Markets, which tracks policy issues for investors.

Pipelines are likely to face a more burdensome approval process under the new administra­tion, according to industry watchers including analysts at Morgan Stanley. Armstrong, whose company operates the Transco gas pipeline that runs from the Gulf of Mexico up the East Coast, says costs associated with litigation, together with the risk of delays, mean the constructi­on of interstate projects in the u.s. can no longer be justified.

he speaks from recent experience. Williams abandoned its Constituti­on natural gas pipeline in 2020 following years of legal battles with New york over a water permit. Its Northeast Supply Enhancemen­t plan, which would have added pipeline segments in New york, Pennsylvan­ia and New Jersey to an existing Williams system, was also effectivel­y killed off last year amid opposition from New york Governor Andrew Cuomo.

In fact, 2020 proved to be an awful year for anyone trying to build a major pipeline. In July, dominion and its partner duke Energy Corp. scrapped plans for their us$8 billion Atlantic Coast natural gas project along the u.s. East Coast after legal battles, permitting hiccups and ballooning costs. Less than 24 hours later, a u.s. court ordered the shutdown of the dakota Access crude oil pipeline — though the order was later sidelined.

In Minnesota, on-theground protests from environmen­tal and indigenous activists continue to dog Enbridge Inc.’s proposal to replace its Line 3 crude pipeline, which shuttles crude from Alberta to Wisconsin.

Meanwhile, the us$6 billion, 303-mile (488-kilometre) Mountain Valley natural gas project — which along with Line 3 are the last remaining mega pipeline projects still in developmen­t in the u.s. — is running into regulatory hurdles after years of cost overruns and delays. Shares of Equitrans Midstream Corp., which is constructi­ng the pipeline between West Virginia and southern Virginia, plunged 9.9 per cent Tuesday after a meeting of federal regulators in Washington failed to advance the project.

Mountain Valley “might be the last one for a good long while,” said Christi Tezak, managing director at Clearview Energy Partners.

TC Energy Corp., which was set to build Keystone, on Wednesday lamented Biden’s decision and said it will cost thousands of jobs. The Canadian company could challenge the move, but “suing your way to successful completion of a project is never a good situation to be in,” Southern Methodist university energy law professor James Coleman said.

While the energy industry digests the Keystone news, it faces other harsh truths. COVID-19 decimated demand and prospects for a recovery to pre-pandemic levels remain uncertain. Though Keystone itself is important for Canadian oil producers, it has lost much of its former appeal to refiners on the u.s. Gulf Coast following years of rising shale supplies.

And while oil stumbled, the renewable energy sector has been on a roll. Investors have fled the fossil fuel sector in droves and flocked to companies in solar, wind and other alternativ­e technologi­es. That trend may determine the kind of big infrastruc­ture projects that get built in years to come.

“Looking farther out, it’s hard to imagine that we’ll never go through a build cycle again,” Fiscalnote’s Bays said of the pipeline business. “But it’s more likely that the next build cycle isn’t gas or oil, but is hydrogen or carbon dioxide.”

 ?? Terray SYLVESTER / REUTERS FILES ?? In the face of U.S. President Joe Biden blocking the Keystone XL pipeline, nobody will announce a new oil pipeline while he is president, says Katie Bays of Fiscalnote Markets.
Terray SYLVESTER / REUTERS FILES In the face of U.S. President Joe Biden blocking the Keystone XL pipeline, nobody will announce a new oil pipeline while he is president, says Katie Bays of Fiscalnote Markets.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada