National Post

Speaker decries taking screenshot of naked MP

Photo an affront to the House’s dignity, he says

- Joan Bryden

• Taking a screenshot of a naked Liberal MP during virtual parliament­ary proceeding­s was an affront to the authority and dignity of the House of Commons, Speaker Anthony Rota ruled Monday.

Rota sternly reminded MPS that it is “strictly forbidden” to take a photograph of Common proceeding­s, whether in-person or virtual and regardless of whether the proceeding­s are beamed to the public.

With that, the Speaker said he considers the procedural aspect of the incident to be “closed.”

But Liberals are not letting the matter drop. They are taking it to the all-party board of internal economy, the governing body of the Commons. If the board does not agree to impose sanctions on the Bloc Québécois MP who has admitted taking the photo, the Liberals are threatenin­g to take it to the police.

Rota was responding to an incident on April 14 when Liberal MP William Amos inadverten­tly appeared naked on an internal parliament­ary feed of that day’s question period. His image was not seen on the public feed.

Amos has said he was changing his clothes after a jog and did not realize that his laptop camera was turned on.

Bloc Québécois MP Sébastien Lemire last week apologized for taking the screenshot of Amos. He said he had no idea how the photo quickly made its way to the media and ended up circulatin­g online around the globe.

“All members of this House should be able to rely on their colleagues and staff to respect each other in conducting themselves in the chamber, whether in person or virtually,” Rota said Monday.

“It is in everyone’s interest that this practice continues to be observed rigorously. As such, the events of that day is a clear breach of our rules and, more importantl­y, an affront to the authority and dignity of the House and its members.”

Rota added that respecting the rule against photograph­s “has never been more crucial” than during the COVID-19 pandemic, when most MPS are participat­ing in Commons proceeding­s virtually from their homes or offices and at a time when technology makes it easy to widely disseminat­e photos.

“I am therefore counting on everyone’s collaborat­ion to respect the rules in this new operating environmen­t. As far as the House is concerned and the procedural aspect of the issue, I consider the matter closed,” he said.

Amos, who is the parliament­ary secretary to Industry Minister François-philippe Champagne, did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

But Liberal whip Mark Holland said Rota went as far as he could on the matter, having no authority to impose sanctions.

Holland said the matter of sanctions will be raised at the next meeting of the board of internal economy, at which he hopes Lemire will explain with whom he shared the screenshot of Amos.

“If he made the choice to share this with somebody that he thought was confidenti­al and didn’t think it was going to go anywhere, that’s serious But it’s much more serious if he was being irresponsi­ble with this image and sending it all over the place,” Holland said in an interview.

The board operates on the basis of unanimity and if there is no unanimous decision to sanction Lemire and anyone else involved, Holland said the Liberals will “have to look at other actions.”

“Frankly, I really feel when you look at other instances that have been in the public domain of people sharing naked photograph­s of people, there’s a criminal component here,” he said.

“I would have preferred to deal with it in the House but if the House is refusing to take its responsibi­lity to govern itself, then we’re going to have to escalate that further. It’s not acceptable for us that this just kind of gets shrugged at and walked away from.”

Holland said the purpose of taking and sharing the screenshot was to “laugh at and humiliate” Amos. He said he’s heard other MPS talking about Amos’s physique and questioned whether they’d do the same had the photo been of a female MP.

 ?? PETER J. THOMPSON / NATIONAL POST ?? “My skin colour does not define truth. As Christians, the Bible is supposed to define
what’s true,” says cultural blogger Samuel Sey.
PETER J. THOMPSON / NATIONAL POST “My skin colour does not define truth. As Christians, the Bible is supposed to define what’s true,” says cultural blogger Samuel Sey.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada