National Post

Don’t protect MPS from the voters

- SABRINA MADDEAUX

It’s been a rough 15 months since Canada’s first case of COVID-19. As it stands, our country’s pandemic response hovers somewhere between subpar and wondering what’d happen if we just let Polkaroo run the country for a bit. Yet amid all the anger, despair, and more anger, Canadians on both all sides of the political spectrum see a light at the end of the tunnel: voting the incompeten­t, corrupt, and cowardly out of office when the pandemic finally ends.

This is what democracy is all about. Politician­s make decisions, then they answer to voters. Except, in Canada, that’s much easier said than done. With both the ruling party and official opposition committed to protecting nomination­s for sitting MPS, many incumbents will shirk any real accountabi­lity for the past year.

Protected nomination­s grant MPS a guaranteed spot on their party’s ticket. They don’t have to worry about potential challenger­s or being “primaried.” This practice has always been an affront to Canadian democracy, but in the wake of the country’s worst crisis since the Second World War, it’s dangerousl­y autocratic. More than ever, Canadians must be able to freely select their leaders.

In 2019, despite Justin Trudeau’s public commitment to open nomination­s, the Liberal Party of Canada decided to protect incumbents granted they meet a lax set of qualificat­ions. These included knocking on 3,500 doors or making 5,000 phone calls, and recruiting 30 new monthly donors. In October 2020, the Liberals whittled that list down to just one farcical requiremen­t. Now, in order to skip the nomination process, MPS must recruit a whopping total of 10 new monthly donors with no minimum contributi­on. There are literal cats on the internet who can raise more money than that.

Liberals point to it being harder to fundraise and sign up supporters during COVID, but it shouldn’t escape scrutiny that their decision coincided with declining approval ratings and the realizatio­n Canadians were about to face a brutal second wave. Moreover, it’s unclear how having a captive audience trapped in their homes makes it harder to reach constituen­ts by phone.

Lest you think this is a partisan issue, the urge to dodge grassroots challenges is just as strong across the aisle. Last February, the Conservati­ve Party of Canada announced they’d protect all 121 of their incumbent MPS if an election occurred prior to June 2021. After Conservati­ve MPS lobbied to extend the policy indefinite­ly, the party quietly acquiesced in April, saying incumbents could run unopposed post June 2021, provided they raise a minimum of $15,000– a low bar in the world political fundraisin­g. The irony of a party that largely opposes government interventi­on hamstringi­ng its own nomination­s can’t go unremarked upon.

While these attempts to subvert democracy should outrage all voters, they should especially anger Millennial­s and Gen Z. By protecting incumbents, party elites block paths to political participat­ion and power for young Canadians experienci­ng historic economic and social crises. Safeguardi­ng the status quo also means limiting opportunit­ies for women, candidates from diverse background­s, and the LGBTQ community — all of whom Conservati­ves and Liberals claim they want to embrace and add to their ranks. It ensures our political leadership will largely look the same for longer than it should.

Want to challenge Liberal parliament­ary secretary for housing Adam Vaughan and his pro-boomer policies? You can’t, because his seat is protected. Think you can do better than Conservati­ve MP Cheryl Gallant, who was recently accused of peddling conspiracy theories? Too bad, you’re stuck with her. Sure, you can technicall­y run for one of the other parties or independen­tly, but many ridings aren’t realistica­lly going to flip or vote in an unaffiliat­ed candidate. Conservati­ves and Liberals alike know this and are taking advantage of it to hoard power.

Canadians are only being offered the illusion of choice; a wilting salad bar of fauxmocrac­y disguised as a sumptuous buffet full of possibilit­ies. Even in unheld ridings, both Liberals and Conservati­ves stand accused of delaying open nomination­s so party leaders can inject their preferred candidates.

The next election will be one of the most important in Canada’s history. While voters may not agree on the correct path forward, they should all demand the right to hold politician­s accountabl­e for their COVID response. Citizens, if they so choose, should have a fair shot at running for Parliament. As gaps widen between segments of Canadian society — rich and poor, homeowners and renters, essential workers and desk jockeys — we can’t allow the political elite to further distance themselves from the people they’re meant to represent.

 ?? AARON VINCENT / THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Want to challenge Liberal parliament­ary secretary for housing Adam Vaughan, left, and his pro-boomer policies? You can’t, because his seat is protected.
AARON VINCENT / THE CANADIAN PRESS Want to challenge Liberal parliament­ary secretary for housing Adam Vaughan, left, and his pro-boomer policies? You can’t, because his seat is protected.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada