National Post

Judge refuses to reinstate Fortin

General told to file grievance with military

- Christophe­r Nardi

• A judge has thrown out Maj.-gen. Dany Fortin’s attempt to have the Federal Court reverse his firing as head of Canada’s COVID-19 vaccine rollout, saying he needs to go through the military grievance process first.

“Mgen Fortin has not demonstrat­ed that the decision to remove him from his PHAC position cannot be redressed through the CAF grievance process. Therefore, he must avail himself of the grievance process before proceeding on judicial review,” Justice Ann Marie Mcdonald wrote in a 20-page decision released Tuesday.

In a statement, one of Fortin’s lawyer, Natalia Rodriguez, said they are “disappoint­ed” in the ruling and are considerin­g potential next steps.

“It is unfortunat­e that the Court did not address the merits of Major-general Fortin’s case and instead determined that the grievance was an adequate alternativ­e remedy,” Rodriguez said in an email.

Fortin was removed from his secondment at the public health agency back in May, months after he was informed that he was under investigat­ion by military policy for alleged sexual misconduct for an incident that dates back decades.

In the spring, Fortin asked the federal court to review the decision and order the government to reinstate him to his job at PHAC or for the Canadian Armed Forces to assign him to a post of equivalent military grade.

But the attorney general asked the federal court to throw out the applicatio­n, arguing that his lawsuit was premature because he had not filed a military grievance first.

“Parliament has establishe­d a broad and comprehens­ive scheme within the Canadian Armed Forces for resolving complaints about the administra­tion of the Canadian Armed Forces,” lawyer Elizabeth Richards said about the military grievance process during the first day of hearings two weeks ago.

“And the applicant cannot simply bypass that scheme and come to this court unless he establishe­s exceptiona­l circumstan­ces, and none exist” in Fortin’s case, she added.

In her decision, Mcdonald agreed with Richards.

“The reinstatem­ent request made by Mgen Fortin is more properly considered by the CAF and not by the Courts. Mgen Fortin is and has always been a member of the CAF and the essential nature of the issues he raises are clearly service-related matters that should be addressed internally,” Mcdonald wrote.

In August, Quebec prosecutor­s charged Fortin with one count of sexual assault for an event that allegedly occurred in 1988 while he was still a student in military college. Fortin denies any wrongdoing and his criminal case is expected to return to court on Nov. 5.

Throughout the case, Fortin alleged that his firing was the product of political interferen­ce from the Prime Minister’s Office, the health minister, the minister of national defence as well as the Clerk of the Privy Council, rather than the sole decision of Canada’s acting Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Wayne Eyre.

During the court hearing, Fortin’s lawyers argued that the decision to fire him was based on an improper “political calculus,” that it was not “justified, intelligib­le or transparen­t,” and that the government did not use the “appropriat­e” considerat­ions when removing him.

Government lawyers disagreed, arguing that the decision was made solely by Eyre, though many other stakeholde­rs’ views were considered.

Because she ruled on the government’s motion to strike Fortin’s applicatio­n, Mcdonald did not rule on Fortin’s claim of political interferen­ce. But she said that the allegation still did not allow Fortin to jump over the regular grievance process.

“In my view, the high-profile nature of Mgen Fortin’s position and the allegation­s of political interferen­ce are not exceptiona­l circumstan­ces that allow him to bypass the internal grievance process,” reads the decision.

Fortin’s lawyer disagreed on Tuesday.

“Our position continues to be that the military grievance process cannot quash a decision made outside of the military chain of command and that it lacks authority over the ministers who made the decision to remove Major-general Fortin from his secondment,” Rodriguez said.

HE MUST AVAIL HIMSELF OF THE GRIEVANCE PROCESS.

 ?? JUSTIN TANG / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES ?? Maj.-gen. Dany Fortin was removed from his secondment at the Public Health Agency
of Canada in May, months after he was informed that he was under investigat­ion by military policy for alleged sexual misconduct.
JUSTIN TANG / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES Maj.-gen. Dany Fortin was removed from his secondment at the Public Health Agency of Canada in May, months after he was informed that he was under investigat­ion by military policy for alleged sexual misconduct.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada