National Post

Sussexes’ ex-aide voices ‘regret’ at year-long silence

Press secretary reveals texts from duchess

- HANNAH FURNESS

The Duchess of Sussex’s most trusted aide came forward to give evidence in a Court of Appeal case following a one-year campaign to persuade him, after he “regretted” failing to speak out sooner, the court has heard.

Jason Knauf, the Sussexes’ former communicat­ions secretary, provided a statement to the court detailing emails and text exchanges that showed the Duchess had authorized collaborat­ion with the authors of her biography.

They revealed her telling him that “obviously everything I’ve drafted is with the understand­ing that it could be leaked,” and sharing her view that if her father, Thomas Markle, took the decision to share it, “at least the world will know the truth.”

The emails provided by Knauf led the Duchess to apologize to the Court of Appeal for failing to remember an exchange in which she gave written authorizat­ion for him to brief the authors of Finding Freedom.

They have been the key part of The Mail on Sunday’s campaign to overturn a summary judgment that it unlawfully breached the Duchess’s privacy, copyright and data protection by publishing extracts from the letter to Thomas Markle.

The Court of Appeal is currently hearing arguments that the case should instead be heard at trial. The Mail on Sunday argues that Knauf’s new evidence should be admitted.

A witness statement from the paper’s lawyer, Keith Mathieson, has now revealed that Knauf resisted having any part in the legal proceeding­s for a year, before “regretting” his decision.

Saying he first approached Knauf in September 2020, and tried again without success on numerous occasions, it was not until July 2021 that he provided a written statement, insisting it was from a “position of neutrality” and covering only the relevant facts.

Mathieson said that he had approached Knauf again in July, having “received informatio­n from a confidenti­al source to the effect that Mr. Knauf now regretted not providing a witness statement to us.”

“It did indeed turn out that, since the summary judgment had deprived Mr. Knauf of the opportunit­y to provide evidence at a trial, he now wished to provide a witness statement to the parties so that his evidence could be considered as part of the appeal,” he said.

He went on to explain that it had been impossible to convince Knauf, through his lawyers, to provide testimony before then.

At the time, it was considered likely that Knauf and his former colleagues, including other press secretarie­s and a private secretary who had worked for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex at the relevant time, would be called to give evidence at trial.

Instead, the Duchess successful­ly applied for a summary judgment and, in February 2021, Lord Justice Warby ruled that The Mail on Sunday was unlawful in its actions. The decision meant that no arguments were heard at full trial, and no witnesses were heard in the High Court.

A month later, a bullying complaint made against the Duchess, filed by Knauf during his time at Kensington Palace and concerning two different members of staff,

I HAVE ADOPTED A POSITION OF NEUTRALITY THROUGHOUT.

came to light. In a statement dated Sept. 21, 2021, Knauf said: “I consider it the right thing to do to set out informatio­n that I am advised may be relevant to the court’s considerat­ions.”

He added: “I have adopted a position of neutrality throughout, offering to provide informatio­n that I am advised is relevant to both parties.

“This has been a difficult and time-consuming process that I have not sought a role in.”

The Duchess described Knauf as a trusted adviser, and used elements from their email and text exchanges in her own witness statement.

The Court of Appeal on Thursday heard closing arguments in the appeal, as the Duchess’s legal team reiterated her right to privacy and copyright over the handwritte­n letter.

Justin Rushbrooke QC, on behalf of the Duchess, argued that the new texts and emails did not change the case, showing that his client considered the letter confidenti­al and did not provide any details on it to the authors of Finding Freedom.

 ?? CAITLIN OCHS / REUTERS ?? “Everything I’ve drafted is with the understand­ing that
it could be leaked,” Meghan Markle told a trusted aide.
CAITLIN OCHS / REUTERS “Everything I’ve drafted is with the understand­ing that it could be leaked,” Meghan Markle told a trusted aide.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada