National Post

End limits on religious gatherings

- Kristopher Kinsinger Kristopher Kinsinger is an Ontario lawyer and the national director of the Runnymede Society. The views expressed here are his own.

Two Ontario churches — Aylmer’s Church of God Restoratio­n and Waterloo’s Trinity Bible Chapel — recently argued in the Ontario Superior Court that they shouldn’t be fined for violating restrictio­ns on religious gatherings that were meant to curb transmissi­on of COVID-19. Such measures, they contend, unjustifia­bly limit freedom of religion under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Significan­tly, the restrictio­ns being challenged are not those currently in place throughout Ontario, but the limits that were in force last spring. At the time, COVID-19 cases were on the rise, hospitals were at or were exceeding their capacity and, crucially, vaccines (to say nothing of booster shots) were not yet widely available.

Even if this particular charter challenge is dismissed, it would be a mistake to conclude that the Ontario government has been granted an ongoing licence to restrict religious gatherings with impunity. Indeed, the government seems to have already affirmed that a time is coming — perhaps very soon — when these limits will no longer be demonstrab­ly justified.

In January, the Ontario government implemente­d another round of restrictio­ns on in-person gatherings to combat a rapid rise in cases brought on by the Omicron variant. Indoor religious services were notably exempt from new capacity limits, even as restaurant­s and movie theatres closed their doors. So long as worshipper­s wore their masks and maintained a two-metre distance from each other, they could continue to gather at the same capacities that have been in place since last summer.

Some will, no doubt, object to the seemingly preferenti­al treatment that churches and other places of worship have received during the Omicron wave. After all, they’ll say, the virus doesn’t care whether you’re assembled for worship or to watch a hockey game. Why should churches be allowed to gather when non-religious assemblies are prohibited?

These objections fail to appreciate not only the unique constituti­onal calculus for restrictin­g religious gatherings, but also how this calculus has changed over the past year. While less likely to prevent transmissi­on of Omicron than previous variants, Ontario’s successful rollout of COVID-19 vaccines has played a significan­t role in curbing hospitaliz­ations and deaths. This has allowed the province to take on more risks than it did during the earlier stages of the pandemic.

Our capacity to adopt such risks, however, also demands transparen­cy about our priorities as a society and, just as importantl­y, how those priorities are reflected in our law.

Places of worship eschew the classifica­tions of “essential” and “non-essential” that have come to dominate our pandemic vocabulary. By listing religious freedom among the “fundamenta­l freedoms,” our charter affirms that the free exercise of religion is a public good worth protecting. Limitation­s on this freedom accordingl­y demand a higher level of justificat­ion than activities that don’t receive such constituti­onal protection.

Overall, religious communitie­s have shown considerab­le patience throughout the pandemic as government­s have cycled through varying restrictio­ns on their ability to gather for worship. But these restrictio­ns have come at a high cost. Many religious rites and sacraments can only be administer­ed in person or as part of an assembled religious body; to prohibit a church’s full membership from gathering thus undermines a crucial aspect of its worship.

As time goes on, the cost of being unable to participat­e in religious gatherings without restrictio­ns is only going to grow greater. As I wrote in these pages last February (in response to the arrest of an Alberta pastor who was jailed for refusing to abide by such limits), “the constituti­onal cost of restrictin­g peaceful assemblies — religious or otherwise — will eventually outweigh the relative public benefit. This is not a question of if but when.”

Those words remain just as true now as they did a year ago. Thankfully, the Ontario government appears to have tacitly accepted this conclusion: under the province’s current reopening plan, places of worship are set to have all capacity restrictio­ns lifted by midmarch, even if masks and other best practices may remain in place until the summer.

That day can’t come soon enough.

THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION IS A PUBLIC GOOD WORTH PROTECTING.

 ?? DEREK RUTTAN / POSTMEDIA NEWS FILES ?? Police enter the Church of God in Aylmer, Ont.,
last May after a judge ordered the locks on the doors be changed to prevent gatherings.
DEREK RUTTAN / POSTMEDIA NEWS FILES Police enter the Church of God in Aylmer, Ont., last May after a judge ordered the locks on the doors be changed to prevent gatherings.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada