National Post

KREMLIN INSIDERS ALARMED OVER TOLL

SUPPORT REMAINS DEEP BUT OPPOSITION IS STARTING TO SURFACE

-

Almost eight weeks after Vladimir Putin sent troops into Ukraine, with military losses mounting and Russia facing unpreceden­ted internatio­nal isolation, a small but growing number of senior Kremlin insiders are quietly questionin­g his decision to go to war.

The ranks of the critics at the pinnacle of power remain limited, spread across high-level posts in government and state-run business. They believe the invasion was a catastroph­ic mistake that will set the country back for years, according to 10 people with direct knowledge of the situation. All spoke on condition of anonymity, too fearful of retributio­n to comment publicly.

So far, these people see no chance the Russian president will change course and no prospect of any challenge to him at home. More and more reliant on a narrowing circle of hardline advisers, Putin has dismissed attempts by other officials to warn him of the crippling economic and political cost, they said.

Some said they increasing­ly share the fear voiced by U.S. intelligen­ce officials that Putin could turn to a limited use of nuclear weapons if faced with failure in a campaign he views as his historic mission.

To be sure, support for Putin’s war remains deep across much of Russia’s elite, with many insiders embracing in public and in private the Kremlin’s narrative that conflict with the West is inevitable and that the economy will adapt to the sweeping sanctions imposed by the U.S. and its allies. And public backing remains strong as the initial shock and disruption from sanctions has given way to a kind of surreal stability in Russia.

Still, more and more top insiders have come to believe that Putin’s commitment to the invasion will doom Russia to years of isolation and heightened tension that will leave its economy crippled, its security compromise­d and its global influence gutted. A few business tycoons have made veiled statements questionin­g the Kremlin’s strategy, but many powerful players are too fearful of the widening crackdown on dissent to voice their concerns in public.

The skeptics were surprised by the speed and breadth of the response by the U.S. and its allies, with sanctions freezing half of the central bank’s $640 billion in reserves and foreign companies ditching decades of investment to shut down operations almost overnight, as well as the steadily expanding military support for Kyiv.

Senior officials have tried to explain to the president that the impact of the sanctions will be devastatin­g, erasing the two decades of growth and higher living standards that Putin had delivered during his rule.

Putin brushed off the warnings, saying that while Russia would pay a huge cost, the West had left him no alternativ­e but to wage war, the sources said. The president remains confident the public is behind him, with Russians ready to endure years of sacrifice for his vision of national greatness, they said. With the help of tough capital controls, the ruble has recovered and while inflation has spiked, economic disruption remains relatively limited.

Putin is determined to push on with the fight, even if the Kremlin has had to reduce its ambitions from a quick takeover of much of the country to a gruelling battle for the Donbas region. Settling for less would leave Russia vulnerable and weak in the face of the threat seen from the U.S. and its allies, according to this view.

In the weeks since the invasion started, Putin’s circle of advisers and contacts has narrowed even further, according to two people. The decision to invade was made by Putin and just a handful of hawks including Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, General Staff chief Valery Gerasimov, and Nikolai Patrushev, secretary of Russia’s Security Council, these people said.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov didn’t immediatel­y respond to a request for comment. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov didn’t give a direct answer about whether Russia might use nuclear weapons.

Inside the main successor to the KGB, the Federal Security Service, frustratio­n is growing, according to Andrei Soldatov, an expert on the Russian security services. Others there had expected the fighting would last no more than a few weeks, according to people familiar with the situation.

Only one senior official has so far broken publicly with the Kremlin over the invasion: Anatoly Chubais, the unpopular architect of the 1990s privatizat­ions and the Kremlin’s climate envoy. He left the country.

Others who sought to quit — including central bank chief Elvira Nabiullina — were told they had to stay, according to people familiar with the situation. Some lower-profile officials asked to be transferre­d to jobs not related to policy making, the people said.

Senior officials have denounced those who left the country as “traitors.”

Among business tycoons, many of whom saw yachts, properties and other holdings seized under sanctions, a few have been critical of the war — though without mentioning Putin.

Metals tycoon Oleg Deripaska called the war “insanity” in late March, saying it could have ended “three weeks ago through reasonable negotiatio­n.” He warned fighting could continue for “several more years.”

 ?? MIKHAIL KLIMENTYEV / SPUTNIK / AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? Kremlin critics believe President Vladimir Putin’s Ukraine invasion has been a catastroph­ic blunder.
MIKHAIL KLIMENTYEV / SPUTNIK / AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES Kremlin critics believe President Vladimir Putin’s Ukraine invasion has been a catastroph­ic blunder.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada