National Post

Ontario’s Ford defends appointmen­t of ex-staffers

Will help select judges in new committee roles

- Allison Jones

Ontario Premier Doug Ford is defending his government’s appointmen­ts of two former staffers to a committee that helps select provincial judges, saying he’s not going to put Liberals or New Democrats in those roles.

The Toronto Star first reported that Matthew Bondy, a former deputy chief of staff to Ford, is the chair of the Judicial Appointmen­ts Advisory Committee, and Brock Vandrick, Ford’s former director of stakeholde­r relations, is on the committee.

The appointmen­ts are made by Attorney General Doug Downey, and Ford said Friday that his Progressiv­e Conservati­ve government got elected “to get like-minded people in appointmen­ts.”

“I’m not going to appoint some NDP or some Liberal,” he said in response to a question at an unrelated news conference in Brampton, Ont.

Ford suggested that judges and justices of the peace are too lenient on criminals, and are letting people out on bail too frequently, so he wants to see more judicial officials appointed who will keep people in jail.

“How would you like it if someone kicked your door in, put a gun to your head, and all of a sudden you find out that criminal that did that is out on the streets the next day?” he said.

“It’s unacceptab­le. So every single appointmen­t I can to find tough judges, tough JPS to keep guys in jail ... I’m going to do it. So, that’s part of democracy. You voted a party in.”

The committee — made up of three judges, three lawyers and seven members of the public — reviews applicatio­ns and conducts interviews for prospectiv­e Ontario Court judges, then sends a ranked list of its recommenda­tions to the attorney general, who appoints someone from that list.

Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie called on Ford to reverse the appointmen­ts.

“Let’s just be clear with what Premier Ford is saying here: he deliberate­ly appointed former Conservati­ve staffers to the non-partisan committee that helps pick judicial nominees expressly to achieve desired partisan outcomes,” Crombie wrote in a statement. “These are his own words — and it is entirely unacceptab­le. We do not want U.s.-style politiciza­tion of our courts.”

Kristyn Wong-tam, the NDP attorney general critic, said in a statement that the appointmen­ts raise serious concerns about the impartiali­ty of the process of appointing judges.

“Under this government, we have seen our court system spiral into chaos,” Wongtam wrote. “We have seen serious cases get thrown out because of double-bookings and lack of resources, survivors forced to re-live their trauma because of repeated delays. Instead of fixing the mess in our courts, the Attorney General is focused on using their majority to award partisan patronage appointmen­ts and erode people’s faith in our justice system.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada