National Post

NDP motion on Israel a moral test

- JOE ROBERTS

It’s become crystal clear why there have been four ministers of foreign affairs in the past five years under the Trudeau government: it is a rudderless ship with no vision for how Canada should be represente­d on the world stage. The prime minister’s leadership has been catastroph­ic for Canadian foreign policy.

The Liberals have failed to meet our NATO commitment­s, leaving our allies questionin­g our ability and our resolve. They’ve failed to stand with our Israeli allies, who are facing an existentia­l threat. They’ve left Canada’s image degraded, tarnished and nearing the point of total collapse.

It seems that their only foreign policy goals are to win domestic favour. When I was head of Jspacecana­da, a Canadian diplomat told me that Global Affairs Canada’s direction to new postings in Israel or Ramallah was that their job in the region wasn’t to manage Canadian foreign policy — it was to mitigate domestic politics.

It has indeed been a failure of leadership on every level. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s failure, and it is his to bear, has been a failure to provide clear moral leadership. In doing so, he has created a vacuum. Nature abhors a vacuum. So do voters. So they fill it.

In this case, it’s being filled by radical politics more akin to the Soviet Union’s foreign policy of the 1980s than our liberal democratic allies of today.

The NDP’S motion on Canadian policy toward the Israel-hamas war, which will be up for a vote in the House of Commons on Monday, isn’t just a minor product of this failure, it’s a catastroph­ic one — a seismic shift that threatens to upend 50 years of Canadian foreign policy grounded in the pursuit of peace through a negotiated settlement over the Israel-palestine conflict.

This isn’t mere political manoeuvrin­g, it’s playing with fire — a gamble with stakes too high and outcomes too grim to contemplat­e. Let’s be clear: no one desires war. Israel, our steadfast ally in a tumultuous region, least of all. This war is with Hamas, not the Palestinia­n people — a fact that Israel does not equivocate on.

The horrors of conflict and the suffering of Gazans under the yoke of Hamas’s belligeren­ce are tragedies that cannot be overstated. Yet, amid this turmoil, Israel is committed to increasing aid. The expedited constructi­on of a roadway in northern Gaza to facilitate aid, collaborat­ion with Jordan and Egypt to expedite assistance and the convening of aid organizati­ons for efficient delivery, all attest to Israel’s earnest efforts to mend the wounds of war, not deepen them.

However, the NDP’S motion undermines these noble endeavours, misguidedl­y championin­g a unilateral recognitio­n of a Palestinia­n state — a gesture that serves as a trophy to Hamas’s campaign of nihilistic violence.

Such a move doesn’t just reward terror, it legitimize­s it, emboldenin­g Hamas as the de facto voice of the Palestinia­n cause, to the detriment of the Palestinia­n Authority’s already waning influence. This isn’t support for peace, it’s an endorsemen­t of Hamas’s strategic objectives, an action that’s diametrica­lly opposed to the assertion that Hamas, a recognized terrorist organizati­on, must

never be allowed to lead.

Further complicati­ng this debacle is NDP MP Don Davies’ tweet suggesting there is an equivalenc­e between the innocent Israeli civilians who are being held under barbaric conditions by Hamas and the Palestinia­ns who are being held by the Israeli justice system on terrorism charges.

There is no justifiabl­e comparison between perpetrato­rs of terrorism who were arrested under Israeli law, and toddlers and the elderly taken hostage by Hamas on Oct. 7. Israeli prisoners have the right to access lawyers, to contact their families, to health care and to a trial in a court of law — none of which are afforded to the Israeli hostages being held in Gaza.

This isn’t foreign policy, it’s laundering Hamas propaganda through the halls of Canadian democracy, a dangerous false equivalenc­y that dehumanize­s the victims of the Oct. 7 massacre and emboldens the terrorists who are responsibl­e for it.

And where does the Liberal government stand amid this unfolding saga? Its tepid response is a far cry from the robust support one might expect for an ally in distress. If the Liberals stand for anything, this must be their red line. The Canadian public watches closely, their judgment poised to weigh heavily on a government that folds when its principles are tested.

The crux of the matter, the heart around which all else orbits, is the precipice on which Canadian foreign policy teeters. For half a century, Canada has championed a two-state solution brokered through dialogue and mutual concession­s. This motion, if passed, doesn’t just tilt at windmills, it dynamites the very foundation of this long-standing policy, granting a victory to terrorists and making this beleaguere­d Liberal government look weak.

This decision transcends partisan lines and political calculatio­ns. It’s a question of who we are as a nation and what we stand for on the global stage. Do we side with democracy and peace, or do we capitulate to the demands of terror?

The answer must be clear, resolute and unwavering: MPS must reject this motion, affirm our alliance with Israel and uphold the principles of negotiated peace that have guided our foreign policy for decades. Anything less is a concession to terror, a betrayal of our values and a dark omen for the future of internatio­nal diplomacy.

SUCH A MOVE DOESN’T JUST REWARD TERROR, IT LEGITIMIZE­S IT.

 ?? SEAN KILPATRICK / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES ?? NDP MP Don Davies, right, and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh. The NDP’S motion on Canadian policy toward the Israel-hamas war, which will be up for a vote in the House of Commons on Monday, is a seismic shift that threatens to upend 50 years of Canadian foreign policy, Joe Roberts says.
SEAN KILPATRICK / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES NDP MP Don Davies, right, and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh. The NDP’S motion on Canadian policy toward the Israel-hamas war, which will be up for a vote in the House of Commons on Monday, is a seismic shift that threatens to upend 50 years of Canadian foreign policy, Joe Roberts says.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada