National Post

Guilbeault’s EV fantasy is crashing

- ADAM PANKRATZ Adam Pankratz is a lecturer at the University of British Columbia’s Sauder School of Business.

Late last year, when Environmen­t Minister Steven Guilbeault announced the Liberals’ plan to eliminate the sale of cars with internal combustion engines by 2035, a number of people, myself included, rolled their eyes at the government’s interferen­ce in the free market. Little did we know how fast the free market would slap the electric vehicle mandate back to reality, while Canadian taxpayers continue to subsidize green fantasies.

The signs were already there in late 2023, before our environmen­t minister proudly announced he would jettison capitalist principles and create a dirigiste Canadian automobile economy. First, in September 2023, Volkswagen announced it was cutting EV output due to low demand. Then, in November, Ford announced that it, too, would be scaling back EV battery production due to lacklustre demand.

The new year has not changed the story. If anything, the pace of automakers turning their backs on EVS has accelerate­d. General Motors is struggling with production woes, Mercedes-benz has delayed its EV goals and even Tesla has warned that EV sales could be significan­tly lower than predicted.

In response to sagging demand, automakers like Tesla have cut the price of their vehicles, which in turn has cratered the resale value of their cars. The CEO of Hertz stepped down last Friday, after his bets on EVS went awry when their resale value plummeted. Consumers everywhere have taken note.

While automakers are not totally abandoning their long-term electrific­ation goals, they are all recognizin­g that the internal combustion engine will not be disappeari­ng overnight. It will be around for a good long while.

This reality has always been a key sticking point in the energy transition. It was no doubt a dream of Guilbeault’s to stand at a podium and announce his green fantasy to the world. But his refusal to balance priorities and his reliance on government dictates rather than consumer choice to drive the market make his dreams unrealisti­c.

The inability to understand this has resulted in more waste from the government, which has proven time and again that it is utterly incompeten­t at picking winners and losers in business. There are no shortage of bad business ideas struggling to drum up investment, and far too many find willing investors in government, which doesn’t particular­ly care about making a return.

Cue the Liberals opening the money spigot to help their ideology along. So far, Canada has committed to subsidize EV battery plants to the tune of more than $40 billion over the next decade. And this comes at almost the exact same time as automakers are pulling back from their EV production commitment­s, due to poor sales and low profitabil­ity. Well done, guys. Nice job.

At the time they were announced, the break-even points for the subsidy deals were estimated to be between 11 and 23 years. With the drop in EV production commitment­s, it would be interestin­g to see revised timelines for these already long payback periods.

While such deals and the transition to EVS is complex at the best of times, the government always finds ways to make the situation worse. This is mainly because, despite ample evidence to the contrary, it continues to think it knows better than the companies themselves and the market forces to which they are subjected.

Consumers are currently sending a very loud and very clear message to both companies and government­s: “We don’t want EVS.” The companies have heard it and adjusted their strategies, because they are responsibl­e to shareholde­rs and care about catering to consumer desires.

They also are exceptiona­lly well placed to respond to the real-time sales data they are receiving. Ford, GM, Mercedes, VW and Tesla all know consumers aren’t adopting EVS quickly and have reacted accordingl­y.

Yet the government refuses to budge in the face of verifiable consumer data. The result is continuous policy decisions that place politics over productivi­ty, to our collective detriment.

Sadly, our government remains obstinate. Minister Guilbeault and company don’t seem to care. In response to EV reality, they have taken an approach that’s diametrica­lly opposed to market efficiency: sticking their heads in the sand. Perhaps, though, we shouldn’t be surprised — a flightless bird that lays enormous eggs is a decent metaphor for Guilbeault and his party at the moment.

THE GOVERNMENT REFUSES TO BUDGE IN THE FACE OF VERIFIABLE CONSUMER DATA.

 ?? DAN JANISSE / POSTMEDIA NEWS ?? While automakers are not totally abandoning their long-term electrific­ation goals, they are all recognizin­g
that the internal combustion engine will not be disappeari­ng overnight, Adam Pankratz writes.
DAN JANISSE / POSTMEDIA NEWS While automakers are not totally abandoning their long-term electrific­ation goals, they are all recognizin­g that the internal combustion engine will not be disappeari­ng overnight, Adam Pankratz writes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada