National Post

Premier Legault, tear down constructi­on industry walls

- Gabriel Giguère Gabriel Giguère is a public policy analyst at the Montreal Economic Institute.

Question: How many workers does it take to change a door in a Quebec school? Answer: As many as seven, according to the province’s labour minister, Jean Boulet. Why? Because the carpenter who works on what’s inside the wall has to leave installati­on of the door frame to the interior systems installer, who must let the plasterer do the plastering, and so on. And people wonder why Canada has a productivi­ty problem!

To address this sorry state of affairs, the minister has tabled a bill to modernize the Quebec constructi­on industry and, among other things, let constructi­on workers do more work across job classifica­tions. Although the new legislatio­n would reduce the number of workers needed to change the door, it would do so only if everything can be done in a single day. If it takes longer than that, the old featherbed­ding rules apply.

The bill is therefore a step in the right direction, but only a tiny step. With all the major housing projects currently needed at this point, Quebec should really be taking a giant leap, not just a tentative first step. Instead of maintainin­g the same number of regulated trades and opening the door to a trickle of versatilit­y, the government should reduce this number drasticall­y, allowing all constructi­on workers more flexibilit­y.

Quebec’s regulatory framework governing constructi­on trades is particular­ly rigid, establishi­ng 25 trades, each with its own compulsory certificat­ion. The partitions between the different trades prevent constructi­on workers from carrying out related tasks, even those that require little training.

For example, if you want to re-do your kitchen by the book, with a new ceramic backsplash and linoleum flooring, you’ll need the services of two distinct tradespeop­le — even if several of the skills involved are transferab­le from one project to the other.

But the new bill only allows constructi­on workers to carry out related tasks that are part of a single sequence of work and are completed in a single day. A real productivi­ty boost for the industry would require tearing down more of the partitions between trades.

Quebec’s constructi­on industry is the country’s most siloed. Ontario and British Columbia have only seven certified trades each. In Ontario, many jobs can be carried out by a single worker, which has obvious productivi­ty benefits.

As if the multiplica­tion of trades weren’t bad enough, in Quebec several hundred hours of courses are required in order to practice each of the 25 constructi­on trades.

The case of house painters demonstrat­es the absurdity of this approach. The provincial government requires 900 hours of training. Elsewhere in the country, there are no such prerequisi­tes.

In those provinces, when painting work is hard to come by, painters can reinvent themselves as plasterers or drywall installers.

And when there are too many paint jobs for the number of painters around, those who practice related trades can more easily lend a hand. For workers, certificat­ion can be a straitjack­et, making it harder to take up a trade and confining them to it once they’re in.

Painters are not the only ones in this situation, however. Of the 25 constructi­on trades requiring certificat­ion in Quebec, 13 require certificat­ion in no other province. Removing compulsory certificat­ion for these 13 trades should be the starting point for deregulati­on.

This would allow the sector to equip itself to address productivi­ty issues as it struggles with what it says is a shortage of 7,760 workers.

But how much of that shortage is artificial­ly created, by keeping workers from doing work they’re perfectly capable of doing?

More flexible rules would allow the existing number of workers to do more than they’re doing now.

That’s the essence of productivi­ty. And Canada has a productivi­ty problem right now.

Instead of trying to lock our constructi­on workers into a few well-defined boxes, let’s trust in their skills. They can do a lot more than bureaucrat­s think they can.

MORE FLEXIBLE RULES WOULD ALLOW THE EXISTING NUMBER OF WORKERS TO DO MORE THAN THEY’RE DOING NOW.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada