National Post

Ontario’s net-zero transition: ‘Challengin­g’ or impossible?

- Robert Lyman Robert Lyman is a retired energy economist.

Ontario’s Independen­t Electricit­y Systems Operator (IESO) recently issued its Annual Planning Outlook setting out its projection­s of provincial electricit­y demand, generation capacity and energy needs over the period 2025-50. The report foresees steady growth year after year, with total electricit­y demand increasing 60 per cent over the next 25 years. As a result, IESO foresees a growing supply shortfall and large “acquisitio­n needs” starting as soon as 2029.

What are the chances the province will be able to build enough capacity to meet these new demands? IESO set out its views on policy and planning in December 2022 in Pathways to Decarboniz­ation, a largely-ignored but extremely important report to Ontario Energy Minister Todd Smith.

The Pathways report assessed both the feasibilit­y and cost of complying with the federal government’s goal of reaching net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. Using the “can-do” terminolog­y of which profession­al engineers are such masters, the report provides a factual assessment of the changes that would be required in terms of generation, transmissi­on and investment. In several places, it acknowledg­es how “challengin­g” these changes would be. “Challengin­g” may be the closest engineers ever come to meaning “impossible.”

Complete decarboniz­ation of the Ontario economy would entail two broad transforma­tions. First, all or nearly all the energy used now based on oil and natural gas would have to either cease or be converted to electricit­y. Second, the province’s capacity to supply electricit­y through non-hydrocarbo­n sources (either by generation or imports from Quebec) would have to rise by enough to meet the increased demand. IESO projects that electricit­y demand would double — from about 150 terawatt hours (TWH) in 2024 to 300 TWH in 2050, for an annual average increase of almost 5.8 TWH or 3.9 per cent per year. To put that in perspectiv­e, Ontario’s electricit­y demand has declined almost every year since 2007.

To meet these needs, provincial generation capacity would have to increase from about 42,000 megawatts (MW) today to about 88,000 MW in 2050.

How “challengin­g” is that? Given expected rates of obsolescen­ce, the capacity of the generation plants now in place will decline to 19,600 MW by 2050. This means 68,400 MW of capacity would have to be built over the next 26 years. The land required for additional generation alone would be 14 times the area of Toronto, most of which would be for wind turbines. The trained labour force required to build all these plants is six times what is currently available. Regulatory reviews that now often take 10 to 15 years or even longer would have to be drasticall­y speeded up or sharply curtailed, no doubt in the face of significan­t objections from landowners, activists and Indigenous communitie­s.

IESO sees most new generation capacity coming from new nuclear plants, industrial wind turbines and hydrogen. The last grassroots nuclear power plant in Ontario was Darlington, completed in 1993. Only one additional large nuclear plant is even in the preplannin­g stage, and if that proceeds, it probably will not enter production before 2045.

IESO estimates additional wind generation capacity of 17,600 MW will be required. That’s more than three times current capacity. At today’s average wind turbine capacity of 3.3 MW for equipment with a 130-foot tower, that’s more than 5,300 more turbines, each of which may involve a fight with rural residents.

Even more surprising is IESO’S projected addition of 15,000 MW of hydrogen-based generation, where precisely none exists today.

The total cost of all this new generation, excluding financing costs, would be about $400 billion in 2022 dollars, or around $15.4 billion per year on average. By comparison, Ontario Power Generation’s total capital expenditur­es in 2023 were $2.8 billion, just one-fifth of what will be required per year.

And that’s just generation. The requiremen­ts for additional transmissi­on and distributi­on capacity are almost awe-inspiring. There would be a large “build-out” of Ontario’s existing transmissi­on networks at a cost ranging from $20 billion to $50 billion. Somewhere between 150 and 280 new transforme­r stations would be required. This would mean adding between five and 10 new stations per year, which is more than the number of new stations developed across the province over the past decade. Many would be built in major urban areas. The total cost of these transforme­r stations would be between $5 billion and $10 billion.

What would all this mean for electricit­y rates? Adding wind and solar plants between 2007 and 2016 almost doubled electricit­y rates, and since then annual taxpayer subsidies now exceeding $7 billion per year have been used to keep rates from rising higher. Yet Pathways to Decarboniz­ation estimated that all of these new required expenditur­es to 2050 would end up increasing rates by only 20 to 30 per cent. That estimate is all but certain to be revised. Keeping rate increases that low is likely to be ... challengin­g.

 ?? FRANK GUNN / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES ?? Ontario’s nuclear power plants are aging, and a new facility will probably not enter production until 2045.
FRANK GUNN / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES Ontario’s nuclear power plants are aging, and a new facility will probably not enter production until 2045.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada