Alberta First Nation entitled to more land

OTTAWA • An Alberta First Nation ended up with less land than it should have received under a treaty made with the Crown well over a century ago, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled.

In a 7-0 decision Friday, the top court declared that the Blood Tribe was entitled to more than 420 square kilometres of additional territory, saying the Crown “dishonourably breached” the treaty provisions.

Members of the Blood Tribe near Lethbridge, Alta., had long argued that Canada did not fulfil a promise made in 1877 to set aside a reserve with an area of one square mile for each family of five.

In its decision, the Supreme Court noted the Crown recently acknowledged its breach of the land entitlement commitment.

However, the court characterized the admission as an eleventh-hour concession in a protracted legal dispute.

Under the treaty, the Blood Tribe was entitled to a reserve of 1,839 square kilometres in area, the court said.

In providing a reserve of just 1,418 square kilometres, Canada “dishonourably breached the treaty land entitlement provisions,” Justice Michelle O’bonsawin wrote on behalf of the court.

A declaration the Blood Tribe was entitled to more land will serve an important role in “identifying the Crown’s dishonourable conduct, assisting future reconciliation efforts and helping to restore the honour of the Crown,” O’bonsawin added.

Neither the Blood Tribe nor the office of the Crown-indigenous relations minister had immediate comment on the ruling’s implications.

The Supreme Court judgment underscored the “sacred nature” of binding commitments made in treaties between the Crown and Indigenous Peoples.

“Treaty promises were intended to be honoured so long as the sun rises and river flows,” O’bonsawin wrote.

In 1877, Treaty No. 7 between the Crown and the Blackfoot Confederacy of First Nations established Blood Tribe Reserve No. 148, which is the largest reserve in Canada.

Ninety-four years later, a Blackfoot researcher concluded the reserve’s size fell short of what was promised through the relevant formula, based on population statistics for the years 1879 to 1884.

Subsequent efforts to negotiate with the responsible federal minister of the day were unsuccessful.

In 1980, the Blood Tribe took its case to Federal Court.

The trial judge dismissed most of the claims but accepted that the size of the reserve, as calculated by the Crown, was too small.

The judge also found the remedies sought by the Blood Tribe were not barred by a six-year statute of limitation that would have taken effect by the late 1970s. The Federal Court of Appeal disagreed.

In its decision Friday, the Supreme Court ruled that the 1982 amendments to the Constitution did not usher in treaty rights, but rather entrenched the Crown’s obligation to respect existing treating rights.