National Post (National Edition)

Another ‘Twist’ in NHL rulebook

Hard to see how Edler incident same as others

- CAM COLE in Vancouver

‘The law,” as Mr. Bumble so aptly put it in Charles Dickens’ Oliver Twist, “is a ass — a idiot.”

In this case, we are not talking about 17th century English law, the part that supposed that a man’s wife acted under his direction at all times. (“If that’s the eye of the law, the law is a bachelor,” Bumble lamented.)

We are, today, addressing the law of the National Hockey League, under which “direction” is a fluid concept, written in chalk, designed to be heavily underlined and accompanie­d by a stern fingerwag, or erased, according to the wind direction.

Case in point: Vancouver Canucks defenceman Alex Edler, pursuing a puck behind the Phoenix Coyotes’ net Thursday night, finds goalie Mike Smith is in the process of playing it. Edler barges into him from behind, knocking the goalie flat, touching off a minor brouhaha as the Coyotes, quite reasonably, rush to their ’keeper’s defence.

Edler gets five minutes for charging, and a hearing late Friday with the department of player safety, a title which, if you were visiting from another planet, you might assume was all about the safety of players.

And here — regardless of how the department’s chief, Brendan Shanahan, ruled — is where the law is substantia­lly as Mr. Bumble described it.

Two springtime­s ago (not to belabour an old sore point), then-Canucks winger Raffi Torres worked up a full head of steam and made an honest effort at beheading Chicago’s Brent Seabrook, blindsidin­g the vulnerable Blackhawks defenceman with a shoulderto-head hit behind the Chicago net in Game 3 of their firstround playoff series.

Torres, despite a history of violent hits and just off a fourgame sentence for knocking Edmonton’s Jordan Eberle silly, got two minutes for interferen­ce, because Seabrook didn’t have the puck. Otherwise, the league ruled — hauling out an obscure bit of fine print in Rule 48, the head-blow rule, and declining to suspend Torres — the hit was perfectly legal because it was delivered within the trapezoid behind the net, the previously unheard-of “hitting zone” in which all hits are deemed to be “north-south” and concepts such as blindside, vulnerable, and defenceles­s are all inapplicab­le.

In fairness, this was under the Colin Campbell administra­tion, which had no “player safety” wording in its mandate. Shanahan, in his early efforts at providing video explanatio­ns for his decisions to suspend, or not suspend, was at minimum more transparen­t and, we hoped, would be more consistent.

But it turns out his job is hopeless. His department is assailed from all sides by conflictin­g interests, unwritten codes, invisible forces, influentia­l objectors, teams less important than other teams ... he’s basically got no chance.

The same night Edler got five for charging Smith, the New York Rangers’ Rick Nash felled Florida’s Tomas Kopecky with a blindside, leaping elbow to the head just after Kopecky had released a shot, in the most obvious spot on the ice, directly in front of the net, and two referees gave it a pass. Not even a minor. No hearing, no suspension.

Is that because Nash is a model citizen, a Ranger, a skill player? Who knows? But then, why Edler? The big, placid Swede plays his position in a dreamlike state, and has shown no previous proclivity for violence.

Leave it for another day to debate the absurdity of Seabrook being fair game in the hitting zone, but not Smith, wearing more padding the Michelin Man, while out of his crease playing the puck like a real hockey player.

Leave it to another day to ask why there should even have been a major to Edler, when Milan Lucic’s steamrolle­ring of Buffalo’s wandering goalie Ryan Miller in November 2011 causing a concussion, drew only a two-minute charging penalty, and no subsequent discipline.

Did Edler make contact with Smith’s head? It doesn’t seem so. Did the hit cause Smith — who apparently is being treated for “whiplash” — to leave the game at the end of the second period? Maybe, maybe not. He might have been injured earlier when Daniel Sedin’s nose punched him in the catching glove.

But the location of the Edler-Smith collision was nearly identical to a hit by Chicago’s Andrew Shaw (also on Smith) that netted him a three- game suspension in the playoffs last spring. In that case, though, Shaw delivered a glancing blow to Smith’s head as he went by. It was a gratuitous head shot, and Shanahan was right to throw the book at Shaw.

But not Nash? But not Torres (that time)? But not Lucic?

The NHL’s interpreta­tion of its rulebook is so riddled with contradict­ions, there is no chance of delivering consistent rulings. Precedents have been all over the map.

Even if there were in place a common-sense blanket rule on, say, headshots — major penalty at minimum regardless of intent, ejection for intent to injure, with supplement­al discipline optional — there are a dozen other rules so absurd, or inconsiste­ntly enforced, the NHL is practicall­y volunteeri­ng to be mocked.

The league wants to get head blows out of the game, but allows fighting because, supposedly, fighters willingly accept the risk. So a player can be tossed for an elbow to the head of an opponent, but not for punching him in the face.

A player, one hand on the stick, waves it in the general direction of the puck-carrier’s hands ... or a goaltender, his hands encased in armor unsuitable for the task, tries to clear the puck and it goes over the glass ... and it’s the same two minutes a guy gets (or often doesn’t get) for obliterati­ng an opponent with a cross-check to the back of the neck in front of the net?

As concerns the Edler-Smith collision, it’s right there in black and white.

“A goalkeeper is not ‘fair game’ just because he is outside the goal crease area,” says NHL Rule 69.4. “However, incidental contact, at the discretion of the Referee, will be permitted when the goalkeeper is in the act of playing the puck outside his goal crease provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact.”

Well, no one’s arguing that Edler tried to avoid hitting Smith, even though it was in the Immunity Zone.

It’s just that, you know, the rulebook is a ass.

 ??  ??
 ?? ANDY MARLIN / GETTY IMAGES ?? Canucks defenceman Alex Edler has shown no previous proclivity for violence.
ANDY MARLIN / GETTY IMAGES Canucks defenceman Alex Edler has shown no previous proclivity for violence.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada