National Post (National Edition)

PROMISE MADE, PROMISE REDACTED

- JOAN BRYDEN

Justin Trudeau’s Liberals pledged to run a more open and transparen­t government — but their Access to Informatio­n Act reforms fall well short of that standard. It’s yet another broken promise, argues John Ivison.

OTTAWA • A Senate committee voted Tuesday to delete a so-called escalator tax on alcohol from the federal government’s budget, defying Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s insistence that only the elected House of Commons has authority over budgetary matters.

The Senate’s national finance committee passed a series of amendments to the budget implementa­tion bill, all aimed at removing the government’s plan to increase the federal excise tax on beer, wine and spirits automatica­lly by the rate of inflation each year.

The amendments came less than 24 hours after the Senate narrowly defeated a motion that would have carved out provisions dealing with the creation of a new infrastruc­ture bank into a separate bill.

The committee — whose membership includes independen­t Sen. Andre Pratte, author of the motion to split the bill — did not propose any changes to the infrastruc­ture bank provisions. However, the bill, as now amended by the committee, must still be put to a vote by the Senate as a whole, where individual senators could opt to propose additional changes. The House of Commons would have to concur with any changes approved by the Senate, something Trudeau has made clear is not in the cards.

But the prime minister’s warning that unelected senators have no business re-writing a budget doesn’t hold water for some senators. Although the Senate can’t initiate a money bill, it does have the right to amend one — or even defeat it outright, as happened in 1993, they note.

“I believe that the Senate does have the right to amend finance bills, not to raise taxes but to otherwise amend them,” independen­t Liberal Sen. Joan Fraser said Tuesday.

Pratte said he may yet support some amendments to the bill, but won’t propose any more himself on the infrastruc­ture bank. The debate and vote on his motion convinced him that a majority of senators have no appetite for changing the bill.

“There’s no use working on amendments when you know the majority of the Senate will reject those amendments.”

Since Trudeau has been clear any changes approved by the Senate would be rejected by the Liberal majority in the Commons, Pratte predicted most senators will wind up bowing to the will of the elected chamber.

“It’s obvious that this is not one of those special circumstan­ces where the Senate would insist on its amendments,” he said. “It’s pretty obvious that the Senate would defer to the government’s will.”

The government maintains the $35-billion infrastruc­ture bank is an integral part of its economic plan.

It is to be launched with $15 billion in direct federal investment­s and another $20 billion in repayable contributi­ons, loans and loan guarantees. The government hopes to leverage up to $5 in private investment for every $1 in government funding to finance infrastruc­ture projects. Pratte and other senators fear the bank’s governance structure could allow political interferen­ce in the choice of projects. They’ve also expressed concern taxpayers will wind up on the hook for projects that go over budget or flop.

The amendments to delete the escalator tax on alcohol were proposed by Conservati­ve Sen. Elizabeth Marshall. At a Senate committee meeting last week, Finance Minister Bill Morneau appealed to senators to stop referring to the provision as an “escalator.” He argued that it would actually result in the tax remaining constant, “in real terms,” once inflation is taken into account.

However, a number of senators expressed concern that the automatic yearly tax hikes would potentiall­y devastate many small Canadian breweries and wineries.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada