National Post (National Edition)

Abandoned oil well battle likely headed to top court, lawyer says

- ALLISON MCNEELY AND KEVIN ORLAND Bloomberg News

CALGARY • A battle over whether energy-company creditors should help pay for cleaning up thousands of abandoned oil wells may be heading to the Supreme Court of Canada.

At the centre of the dispute is Redwater Energy Corp., a small publicly traded oil producer in Alberta that filed for bankruptcy in late 2015. The receiver that’s liquidatin­g the company argues it should be able to sell its best wells and leave the worst behind for an energy industry-funded group to clean up. The province’s regulator argues that buyers should have to take both good and bad wells, even if it means that the sale proceeds will be lower.

A court in Alberta sided with the receiver in May 2016, reducing companies’ concerns about the legal liability of walking away from some of their oil wells. Since then, the number of inactive, abandoned, or otherwise orphaned sites has more than doubled to 3,200, according to the Orphan Well Associatio­n, the cleanup group. The provincial government has given the organizati­on an emergency loan to fund the growing costs.

The Alberta Court of Appeal upheld the lower court ruling in a 2-1 decision last April. The government-run Alberta Energy Regulator and the Orphan Well Associatio­n, who say they’re protecting regulatory and public interests, have appealed the matter to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The questions about who should bear environmen­tal costs, combined with the importance of the lower court’s decision and the implicatio­ns for the industry means the Supreme Court of Canada is likely to look at this case, said for financing, as they try to recoup lost income. But if the lower court’s ruling stands, the industry-funded Alberta Energy Regulator may have to collect more money from energy companies to help pay for the remediatio­n, and the public may need to shoulder some of the burden.

“At the end of the day it is really a decision about where the money goes,” Kashuba said.

The problem is increasing­ly urgent for Alberta as more oil companies go broke. The price of crude oil plunged more than 75 per cent between 2016 court decision, according to the Alberta Energy Regulator.

“Disclaimin­g unprofitab­le sites allows a company to reap the benefits of producing Alberta’s natural resources while avoiding the costs to repair the land, permanentl­y impacting the environmen­t, the economy, and the safety of Albertans,” Ryan Bartlett, a spokesman for the Alberta Energy Regulator, said by email.

The Orphan Well Associatio­n has tripled its annual budget to $45 million for the upcoming year compared with its 2014-2015 budget, paid for by levies on companies in the industry. The group wants the corporatio­ns’ obligation­s to be balanced with taxpayers’ and creditors’, said Brad Herald, chairman of the associatio­n.

“We think there was a good balance there,” Herald said. “These court decisions upset that balance.”

Lenders benefit from the recent decisions because they’re protected from the liabilitie­s of the non-producing wells, which could impact their recovery in bankruptcy, said Geoffrey Richards, New York-based head of North America debt finance and restructur­ing at investment bank Canaccord Genuity.

“I think that from a cost of capital perspectiv­e, had the decision gone in the other direction, you could anticipate that lenders might then begin to price that risk into new loans, which could have a different impact on the industry,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada