National Post (National Edition)
Shell’s $14B contract for Kitimat a sign B.C. may ride second LNG wave
The consortium behind LNG Canada named the prime contractors for its $40-billion export project on Friday, taking the development forward amid concerns that steep import tariffs on some steel components could still make the project untenable.
In a decision the consortium called a “significant milestone,” LNG Canada said U.S.-based and Japan’s would lead the $14-billion construction contract for the liquefied natural gas project in Kitimat on the B.C. West Coast. Construction of the facility would employ thousands of workers and take roughly five years.
The consortium, led by has yet to make a final investment decision on the project, but says it will come down some time this year.
and are the other partners. Shell has hinted in recent months that LNG Canada is among the top contenders for its next major capacity expansion, as the firm looks to maintain its position as the world’s biggest LNG player.
“We’ve got a number of build options in the portfolio,” Jessica Uhl, Shell’s chief financial officer, said in a conference call with analysts Thursday. “LNG Canada is one of the many good options that we have.”
Canada is seen as a preferred destination for LNG export, due to its proximity to Asia and competitive natural gas production in B.C. and Alberta. But in recent years, political dust-ups, environmental opposition, high labour costs and unforeseen provincial taxes on LNG exports have all dampened Canada’s reputation for foreign investment.
Meanwhile, analysts are unsure whether LNG prices will rebound high enough in coming years to justify major new export facilities. A rapid expansion in LNG projects in Australia, Russia, the U.S. and elsewhere over the past 10 years introduced a flood of new supply to the market, depressing prices.
“All of those elements need to come into play,” Uhl said Thursday. “So it’s not just one variable that you need to consider when trying to think about the delivered cost to a given customer.”
A major hang-up for LNG Canada are the steep tariffs that would be placed on prefabricated modules used in the construction of the plant, which would come from China and South Korea. Those import duties could reach as high as 45 per cent.
In mid-2017, the Canada Border Services Agency and Canadian International Trade Tribunal imposed anti-dumping duties on steel imports from countries like Spain, South Korea and China, amid complaints by manufacturers that they were flooding the Canadian market with cheap supplies.
Shell and its partners have applied to Ottawa’s finance department for a remission order, which would effectively waive any tariffs on those steel modules.
Ottawa has yet to issue the order, and analysts say it is unlikely to happen before negotiations around the North American Free Trade Agreement come to a close. The U.S. has been increasingly open to levelling import tariffs on cheap supplies of steel from China and elsewhere, and has threatened similar tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum imports.
“Finance Canada continues to carefully monitor this issue, and we are conducting normal due diligence and consultation with implicated stakeholders,” Finance spokesperson Jack Aubry said in a statement.
Patrick O’Rourke, an analyst with AltaCorp Capital in Calgary, said the project looks increasingly likely to move ahead. A so-called “second wave” in LNG demand could come in the next decade as Asian markets gradually absorb today’s oversupply, analysts say, bolstering the opportunity to build new facilities.
“They’re still very bullish on the LNG market, they’re still seeing a perceived fall in demand in the 2020 timeframe,” O’Rourke said. He gave the project a roughly 60- to 75-per-cent likelihood of moving ahead.
The naming of the key contractors for the construction of LNG Canada is a good sign that the project might move ahead, O’Rourke said, though many other questions of cost and politics still linger. “I think it’s a positive,” he said.