National Post (National Edition)

Class-action filed on ‘abusive’ prison strip searches

Compensati­on sought after procedural move

- Jesse Feith

MONTREAL • Facing what seemed like an insurmount­able “culture of delays” plaguing the provincial court system, in October 2016 the Quebec government announced a series of measures it hoped could remedy the situation.

Among them was that people being held in custody following their arrests in Montreal would no longer make their first court appearance in person before a judge. The hearings would instead be held through a video link-up from local detention centres, depending on where the arrest took place.

But if the measure has reduced delays, it also came with a consequenc­e: people entering Montreal’s Bordeaux or Rivière-des-prairies prisons to use the video technology also need to be stripsearc­hed first, a process the Supreme Court of Canada has deemed “fundamenta­lly humiliatin­g and demeaning.”

A new class-action lawsuit, filed in early December but not yet authorized by a judge, is now seeking compensati­on for people who’ve been affected by the change since October 2016.

“The Supreme Court has been saying (strip searches) should be avoided at all costs unless it’s absolutely necessary,” said Anne-julie Asselin, a lawyer from the firm behind the class-action, Trudel Johnston & Lespérance. “And in our opinion, in these cases, it isn’t necessary.”

More specifical­ly, the class action is seeking compensati­on for anyone brought to either of the two prisons to have their first court appearance via video link, and strip-searched only to be granted their release by the presiding judge.

It also seeks damages for people “arbitraril­y” detained at the prisons while they wait for the paperwork to be transferre­d from the courthouse following their hearing. In all, it argues each class member should be entitled to $2,500.

“He remains strongly marked by this traumatic and humiliatin­g experience. The applicant felt deeply humiliated and despised during the strip search he had to undergo.”

The lead plaintiff in the class action, Mathieu Barbeau, 43, was arrested for impaired driving in Montreal in September. He was brought to a police operationa­l centre and kept overnight.

The next morning, he was loaded into a police van and driven to the Rivière-desPrairie­s prison ahead of his scheduled court appearance, by video, in the afternoon.

After arriving at the prison, the suit alleges that Barbeau was called into a small cubicle with four-feet-high walls and asked to get naked.

The suit says the strip search was performed by the definition establishe­d in the

THE APPLICANT FELT DEEPLY HUMILIATED AND DESPISED DURING THE STRIP SEARCH.

law on Quebec’s correction­al systems: the person, naked, has their mouth, nostrils and ears searched.

They are also to lift “in the case of women, the breasts, and in the case of men, the penis and testicles, and bend to allow the visual inspection of the rectum and vagina.”

Barbeau had never been strip-searched or detained before, the suit says. He was ordered released on a promise to appear after his twominute court appearance by video, but kept detained for another six hours while waiting for the court clerk to transfer the documents to prison authoritie­s.

According to Asselin, the law firm took a random sample of one week in the fall and found roughly 40 cases that could be eligible for the suit.

“If you multiply that by the number of weeks, over two years, it’s a lot of people,” she said. “We know there are several hundred, if not a few thousand.”

The suit contends the practice is abusive, but especially so “since it could easily be avoided.”

It gives examples to illustrate the point. It says the provincial court system is already doing video-conference appearance­s from Montreal police operationa­l centres — where people are not strip-searched — on Saturdays and holidays.

It also points out that Montreal’s municipal court system will start doing video appearance­s from police operationa­l centres on weekdays as of next year.

“Yes, we’re asking for money because these people have suffered deeply from being strip-searched,” Asselin said. “But our main objective is that this practice just ceases — it makes no sense to keep doing it when you know there’s another way to do it.”

Quebec’s public security department, which oversees the province’s correction­al facilities, refused to comment on the class action, or the use of strip searches in general, given the matter could be before the courts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada