National Post (National Edition)

HOW THE PATTERN OF YOUR RETURNS COULD COST YOU A FORTUNE.

- Martin Pelletier On the contrary Martin Pelletier, CFA is a portfolio manager and OCIO at Trivest Wealth Counsel Ltd, a Calgary-based private client and institutio­nal investment firm specializi­ng in discretion­ary risk-managed portfolios as well as investm

When it comes to understand­ing investment risk and return, most people get it wrong — and we can’t blame them, as it can at times be very confusing.

We think this is because of a lack of transparen­cy not only among certain asset classes but also in those factors that can influence a portfolio’s ultimate outcome. This is especially important for those in retirement drawing income from their investment­s, as a misjudgmen­t in risk can prove catastroph­ic when it comes to protecting and growing a family’s hardearned wealth.

A great example that we’ve come across includes thinking that private equity and direct real estate investment­s aren’t as risky as investing in public markets. This quite often happens simply because these types of investment­s aren’t marked-to-market so the regular fluctuatio­ns in values are essentiall­y hidden — until it’s too late when the accountant­s force a writedown or when you actually try to withdraw some of your principal.

For those drawing from a more traditiona­l portfolio of stocks and bonds, there is another huge risk lurking within the dispersion of their portfolio’s returns. More specifical­ly, it’s entirely possible to have two portfolios with the same annual rate of return but with a dramatic difference in terminal value simply due to the timing and pattern of realized yearly returns.

For example, the chart accompanyi­ng this column reflects two $2-million portfolios with the same 6.8-per- cent annual compounded return (randomly generated) over the 20-year period. However, Portfolio 1 experience­s more negative returns in the early years with positive returns being back-end weighted versus the opposite for Portfolio 2.

Both portfolios will have the same terminal value as long as there are no withdrawal­s from either portfolio. But it’s a much different story for someone who is trying to live off the money.

Let’s assume both of the aforementi­oned portfolios maintain their same annual compounded 6.8-per-cent return, but each make an annual distributi­on beginning in Year 1 at $100,000 (fiveper-cent spend rate), growing 2.5 per cent per annum (for inflation) with total distributi­ons amounting to $2,554,000 in each portfolio.

Notice that Portfolio 1 has a terminal value of only

DISTORTED RETURNS $712,000 at the end of Year 20 compared to Portfolio 2 that is substantia­lly higher at $4.3 million. Therefore, two portfolios with the same annual compounded return will have drasticall­y different outcomes to their estate simply because of the pattern of returns.

For those curious about whether this is affecting their own portfolio or not, look for a variance in timeweight­ed versus moneyweigh­ted returns being reported. Money-weighted includes the effects of external cash flows (deposits and withdrawal­s) and measures the actual dollar return generated at the end of the day.

Fortunatel­y, there are some things an investor can do to minimize the risk of this happening to their portfolio.

First, returns need to be smoothed out by reducing portfolio volatility. This can be done through diversific­ation that accounts for the spend rate from the portfolio and adjusting the equity and fixed-income weightings accordingl­y. We would also suggest some planning around balancing targeted terminal estate values against near-term lifestyle and spending needs — with either having to be ultimately adjusted.

Unfortunat­ely, in a lowrate environmen­t, some investors will try to avoid the reality of their situation and instead take on excessive risk, for example by buying illiquid private investment­s that promise what could be unsustaina­bly high levels of income. Instead, we would look at adding in low-correlatio­n asset classes such as REITS which can be helpful in reducing overall portfolio volatility, enhancing income levels and returns while still offering liquidity.

Working on proper portfolio design and implementa­tion is critical to ensuring that one’s goals will be met in the least risky way possible, especially for those in retirement drawing off of their portfolios. The alternativ­e is to think you’re doing OK, only to have the truth emerge when it’s too late.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada