National Post (National Edition)

Companies can have dress codes, but they can’t be discrimina­tory.

Office rules must be truly uniform

- HOWARD LEVITT

Executives across industries are sending companywid­e emails to their employees and releasing public statements expressing outrage over police brutality and acts of anti-Black racism. Never before have so many corporatio­ns taken such a public stance, with some CEOs loudly declaring that Black lives matter in statements and media interviews.

But many Black employees find these statements confusing and hypocritic­al as these announceme­nts and statements of support are inconsiste­nt with their own experience­s in those very companies.

Starbucks Corp. was one such company that recently found itself confronted with accusation­s of hypocrisy. It had made public statements and social media posts supporting the Black Lives Matter movement, but sent an internal memo to employees not to wear Black Lives Matter T-shirts or pins while at work. Once news of these conflictin­g messages became known, the company faced intense backlash and quickly backpedall­ed.

The coffee chain, pivoting on a dime, is now producing 250,000 T-shirts with a Black Lives Matter design, and allowing employees to wear their own BLM clothing or attire, while awaiting the branded shirts.

Some feel that anti-Black racism is primarily an American issue, and that our country is tolerant and inclusive. But there have been enough cases in Canada to suggest otherwise.

Statistics Canada published a report in February demonstrat­ing that Canadian Black adults are less likely to be employed than other adults.

It also reported that the gap in median annual wages had increased largely because the wages of Black workers did not grow as quickly as their colleagues. Studies show that racist biases and roadblocks exist not only in law enforcemen­t, but translate into the workplace. Canadian Black employees face much of the same discrimina­tory pushback as their U.S. counterpar­ts.

In this environmen­t, it’s understand­able then that some, particular­ly Black employees, want to demonstrat­e support for the Black Lives Matter movement at work.

Employers cannot prevent employees from supporting the movement on their own time. However, many employees want to know whether they can wear Black Lives Matter messaging at work. Generally, if you are allowed to wear T-shirts or personaliz­ed accessorie­s at work on a regular basis, you can likely wear supportive Black Lives Matter materials as well.

The reverse is not true. Hateful and racist rhetoric is not legally permitted in the workplace. Companies can have dress codes, but they cannot be discrimina­tory nor enforced in racially discrimina­tory ways.

For example, it would be against the human rights code if a Black employee was fired for wearing a Black Lives Matter shirt, but a non-Black employee kept his job after wearing an ‘All Lives Matter’ shirt or even a T-shirt with another slogan.

In June, a City of Guelph, Ont. employee posted a profanity-laced message on a public “Overheard at Guelph” Facebook group, complainin­g about and mocking Guelph residents who attended a local BLM protest. The employee was placed on administra­tive leave pending an investigat­ion of the social media comments. As a public servant and representa­tive of the community while at work, the employee is legally held to a higher standard and more public scrutiny.

Employee messages cannot go against employer policies, which are inherently bound to the human rights code and anti-discrimina­tion practices.

As such, employees and employers who make statements against Black Canadians

or anti-Black racism can face discrimina­tion charges under the code. If an employee does not feel comfortabl­e with or outright opposes BLM discussion­s in the workplace, they would need to evaluate what their employer’s statements or internal memos have addressed, and schedule discussion­s with their human resources representa­tive to address their discomfort. Conduct that damages the employers’ brand is subject to discipline.

I have discussed employees’ responsibi­lities and consequenc­es of employees’ social media posts in a previous column.

The level of support for the movement across the country would make it difficult for an employer to impede their employees’ support of Black Lives Matter. Not only have many companies made public or internal statements proclaimin­g their support for the movement, but actions taken to suppress or invalidate Black employees’ ability to wear supportive material at work risk discrimina­tion claims against the employer.

In fact, the Ontario Public Service Employees Union has publicly supported the Black Lives Matter movement, and the government of Ontario has published an Anti-Racism Strategic Plan that was most recently updated in March 2020. The province’s actions to promote anti-racist strategies in the workplace, in conjunctio­n with the growing BLM movement, will require employers to tread carefully when preventing certain clothing or accessorie­s from being worn at work.

The Black Lives Matter movement is gaining momentum, and employees will want to continue to show their support at work. Employers can regulate employees’ dress code at work to a certain extent, such as imposing business-casual requiremen­ts or preventing employees from wearing graphic T-shirts at work, however they need to stay within the government and human rights policies. Employers need to be conscious of how they respond in these racially-conscious times.

Financial Post Got a question about employment law during COVID-19? Write to me at levitt@levittllp.com. Howard Levitt is senior partner of Levitt LLP, employment and labour lawyers. He practices employment law in eight provinces. He is the author of six books including the Law of Dismissal in Canada.

 ?? CHRISTIAN PETERSEN / GETTY IMAGES FILES ?? Starbucks made statements supporting the Black Lives Matter movement, but sent a memo to employees not to wear Black Lives Matter T-shirts or pins while at work.
CHRISTIAN PETERSEN / GETTY IMAGES FILES Starbucks made statements supporting the Black Lives Matter movement, but sent a memo to employees not to wear Black Lives Matter T-shirts or pins while at work.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada