National Post (National Edition)

SEC data show US$359 million of GameStop shares failed to deliver

- BRANDON KOCHKODIN

On Jan. 28, the day after GameStop Corp. mania hit its crescendo on the back of a short squeeze for the record books, about US$359 million worth of shares were caught in limbo.

More than 1 million shares were deemed failed-to-deliver that day due either to buyers lacking cash to complete purchases or sellers not having the shares to settle trades, according to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission data.

The SEC report, which covers trading from Jan. 15 through the end of the month, is just one more indication of the dislocatio­n in the market for the video game retailer's shares.

GameStop stock, for months among the most heavily shorted on the New York Stock Exchange, surged more than 1,700 per cent from Jan. 1 through Jan. 27 as a legion of Reddit users piled on, forcing bearish traders to scramble for shares and brokers to take the highly unusual step of curbing trading.

While the SEC's list highlights the extent of the short squeeze, on Reddit's Wall-StreetBets forum, where the GameStop trade was galvanized, it's evidence of something else: the unproven theory that hedge funds were engaged in naked short-selling of the shares.

Short sales — when an investor borrows shares, sells them and then tries to buy them back at a lower price to profit from the difference — are an everyday market occurrence. Naked short selling, the illegal practice of selling shares that aren't known to exist, is just one possible cause of a failure-to-deliver, with more quotidian reasons being human error and administra­tive delays.

“Fails-to-deliver can occur for a number of reasons on both long and short sales,” reads a disclaimer on the SEC website. “Therefore, fails-to-deliver are not necessaril­y the result of short selling, and are not evidence of abusive short selling or `naked' short selling.”

Failures to deliver can result in fines, losses as well as reputation­al harm, and in rare circumstan­ces there's also a risk they could lead to a reduction of market liquidity.

One thing is clear: the Grapevine, Texas-based company is an anomaly in the data. Ranked by the dollar value of traded shares that couldn't be delivered — a sum that was influenced by the ballooning price of GameStop's shares — it was the only company to appear multiple times in the top 10 during the period. And it was only one of two companies, the other being Li Auto Inc., to feature atop a list dominated by exchange-traded funds.

The data, which is released twice a month, tracks securities that had at least 10,000 shares that failed-to-deliver on a daily basis. The total number of shares for each day is a “cumulative number of all fails outstandin­g until that day, plus new fails that occur that day, less fails that settle that day,” according to the SEC's website.

 ?? DADO RUVIC / REUTERS / ILLUSTRATI­ON ?? Naked short-selling by hedge funds is suspected in
the GameStop Corp. trading frenzy.
DADO RUVIC / REUTERS / ILLUSTRATI­ON Naked short-selling by hedge funds is suspected in the GameStop Corp. trading frenzy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada