SAV­AGE LOVE

NOW Magazine - - CONTENTS - By Dan Sav­age On the Love­cast: RealDoll broth­els?! Lis­ten at sav­agelove­cast.com. [email protected]­agelove.net @fakedansav­age on Twit­ter ITMFA.org

Tum­blr porn ban is a blow for sex work­ers

Straight and mar­ried but not bor­ing, and head­ing to my par­ents’ house for our first fam­ily Christ­mas since my ass­hole MAGA brother “stum­bled over” the Tum­blr blog where the wife and I posted about our sex­ual ad­ven­tures. (Pics of MMF three­somes and cross-dress­ing/peg­ging ses­sions, plus some dirty “true enough” sto­ries.) My brother has al­ways been an an­gry screw-up, so he leapt on the chance to make me look bad by send­ing the link to my par­ents, sib­lings and even some close fam­ily friends. Our Tum­blr blog is still up be­cause we aren’t ashamed. Any ad­vice? To­tally Un­cool Ma­li­cious Bas­tard’s

Lame Re­veal

Your Tum­blr blog isn’t go­ing to be up for much longer, TUM­BLR, as the com­pany that owns Tum­blr – Ver­i­zon – is ashamed of your blog and the mil­lions of oth­ers like it. Tum­blr an­nounced last week that all “adult” con­tent is banned as of De­cem­ber 17. And the def­i­ni­tion of “adult con­tent” is pretty broad: “pho­tos, videos and GIFs of hu­man gen­i­talia, fe­male-pre­sent­ing nip­ples and any me­dia in­volv­ing sex acts, in­clud­ing il­lus­tra­tions,” although they will al­low gen­i­tals and those wicked “fe­male pre­sent­ing nip­ples” in im­ages of clas­si­cal art. (No con­tem­po­rary junk or lady nips al­lowed.) This is not just a blow to peo­ple who use Tum­blr for porn – and that’s most peo­ple who use Tum­blr – but also to the sex work com­mu­nity. Sex work­ers had al­ready been driven off most other on­line plat­forms by anti-sex-work cru­saders, and now sex work­ers are be­ing driven off Tum­blr as well. Forc­ing sex work­ers off the in­ter­net won’t end sex work, the stated goal of anti-sex­work cru­saders, but it will make sex work more dan­ger­ous – which tells us ev­ery­thing we need to know about the mo­tives of anti-sex-work cru­saders. While they claim to op­pose sex work be­cause it’s dan­ger­ous, they push poli­cies that make sex work more dan­ger­ous. Sex work­ers weren’t just ad­ver­tis­ing on­line, they were or­ga­niz­ing – in ad­di­tion to hon­ing and mak­ing the po­lit­i­cal ar­gu­ment for de­crim­i­nal­iz­ing sex work, they were screen­ing po­ten­tial clients and shar­ing in­for­ma­tion with each other about dan­ger­ous clients. Just like anti-choice/ anti-abor­tion cru­saders, anti-sex-work cru­saders don’t want to “pro­tect” women; they want to pun­ish women for mak­ing choices they dis­ap­prove of. (As a gen­eral rule: If what you’re do­ing makes peo­ple less safe, you don’t get to claim you’re try­ing to pro­tect any­one – it’s like claim­ing you only set houses on fire to drive home the im­por­tance of smoke alarms.) Any­way, fuck your sex-sham­ing/ smut­sham­ing brother, TUM­BLR. As for there st of your fam­ily, you and the wife should slap smiles on your faces and act like you’ve done noth­ing wrong – be­cause you haven’t done any­thing wrong. Your ass­hole brother is the bad guy, and any fam­ily mem­bers who wish to dis­cuss how of­fended they were by your Tum­blr blog should be di­rected to speak with your brother, as he’s the one who showed it to them.

Straight on the DL

how can i ex­plain to my sis­ters that although I am a free sex­ual woman, I still pre­fer men as sex­ual part­ners? My sis­ters are both in­volved with women and they can­not un­der­stand how, with all the aw­ful sex­ual in­equal­ity in the world, I can still be pri­mar­ily at­tracted to men. Some­times I even imag­ine my sex­u­al­ity as a gay man’s sex­u­al­ity in a woman’s body, and I try to ex­plain it to them in this way. I’m not a se­cret right-winger or some­one kid­ding around by ask­ing this ques­tion. This is a real is­sue.

Give It To Me Straight P.S. I have a straight male friend who says he’s a les­bian trapped in a man’s body. What do you think of this?

Peo­ple don’t choose to be straight – some poor moth­er­fuck­ers are born that way – any more than het­ero-ro­man­tic bi­sex­u­als choose to be het­ero-ro­man­tic bi­sex­u­als. You can’t help who you’re at­tracted to, GITMS, pri­mar­ily or oth­er­wise, and the con­tempt of fam­ily mem­bers can’t change a per­son’s sex­ual or ro­man­tic ori­en­ta­tion. Your sis­ters should un­der­stand that, since they most likely wouldn’t be with women if the con­tempt of fam­ily mem­bers had that kind of power. As for de­scrib­ing your­self as a gay man trapped in a woman’s body and your straight male friend de­scrib­ing him­self as a les­bian trapped in a man’s body… Un­less the two of you are trans – in which case, you could be ho­mos trapped in the wrong bod­ies – your friend is just an­other straight guy mor­ti­fied by the mess straight peo­ple (mostly white, mostly men) have made of the world. You’re also mor­ti­fied by straight­ness, GITMS, or at least the sex­ual in­equal­ity that of­ten comes bun­dled with it. But in­stead of your straight male friend opt­ing out of het­ero­sex­u­al­ity (which he can’t do) or you fram­ing your at­trac­tion to men as a gay thing to get your sis­ters off your back (which you shouldn’t have to do), your friend should iden­tify as straight (be­cause he is) and you should iden­tify as some­one who doesn’t give a shit what her sis­ters think (be­cause you shouldn’t). If good straight guys and “free sex­ual women” in op­po­site-sex re­la­tion­ships don’t iden­tify with het­ero­sex­u­al­ity and/or het­ero-ro­man­tic ori­en­ta­tions, GITMS, all the shitty straight peo­ple will con­clude that they get to de­fine het­ero­sex­u­al­ity (which they don’t).

Don’t lie this Xmas

i’m a gay man in my mid-20S and i’m get­ting more se­ri­ous with a guy I met a few months ago. I was sur­prised to even­tu­ally learn that “Michael” is in his late 30s, since he eas­ily passes for my age. I’m com­fort­able with the age gap, but I’m strug­gling with how to present this to my par­ents. Reli­gious and con­ser­va­tive, they were cor­dial but dis­tant with the last guy I dated (who was my age). I’m afraid the age gap with my new boyfriend will cre­ate even more dis­com­fort for them and that Michael will sense it when he comes along to visit for the hol­i­days. I’m con­sid­er­ing ly­ing to my par­ents if Michael’s age comes up. I’ve chal­lenged my par­ents’ at­ti­tudes for many years – but at this point, I’m will­ing to trade hon­esty for the chance to be treated even a lit­tle bit more like a “nor­mal cou­ple” at Christ­mas. Is it self­ish to ask Michael for per­mis­sion to lie about his age? I’m ner­vous to even share my feel­ings with him, for fear it will give the im­pres­sion I’m em­bar­rassed by him. Awk­ward Gath­er­ings Ex­pected Given

Age Pe­cu­liar­ity

Tell one lie to make your re­la­tion­ship seem more ac­cept­able to your par­ents and you’ll be tempted to tell them more lies – and I don’t know about you, AGE­GAP, but not hav­ing to lie to mommy and daddy any more was one of the rea­sons I came out of the closet. And if you want your par­ents to be com­fort­able with Michael, if you don’t want them to think there’s any­thing wrong with their son dat­ing an older man, de­ceiv­ing your par­ents about Michael’s age is a ter­ri­ble first move. That says you think there’s some­thing wrong with it – and you won’t just be say­ing that to your par­ents, AGE­GAP, you’ll be say­ing it to Michael as well. And let’s say things work out with Michael. The lie you told that first Christ­mas will only serve to make things more awk­ward af­ter you fi­nally tell them the truth about your boyfriend’s age. And if your par­ents are like other mildly or wildly ho­mo­pho­bic par­ents, i.e., if they’re in­clined to re­gard the man who sodom­izes their son as a neg­a­tive in­flu­ence in his life, they may not be­lieve the lie was your idea. They’ll think this creep­ily youth­ful older man – this man who showed up in their home wear­ing a suit made out of the skins of younger gay men – en­cour­aged their son to lie to them so they wouldn’t ob­ject to the re­la­tion­ship in the early stages, when their ob­jec­tions might have had the abil­ity to de­rail it. Fi­nally, AGE­GAP, if your older boyfriend is con­cerned you may be too im­ma­ture for him – not all young peo­ple are im­ma­ture and not all im­ma­ture peo­ple are young, but this shit does cor­re­late – telling him you’re still in the lie-to-mommy-and­daddy stage might prompt him to end this re­la­tion­ship.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada

© PressReader. All rights reserved.