Switch off your cellphone, set yourself free,
COMMENTARY: Silence may truly be golden in the age of the ubiquitous mobile devices.
LONDON • Will miracles never cease? I learned on Monday there is a team of officials in the U.K. Cabinet Office known as the Nudge Unit, charged with suggesting “ways people can make small changes to improve their lives.” Naturally, this sent the taxpayer in me into a lather of indignation. No wonder the national debt is so mountainous if crackpot initiatives like this are given the green light in Whitehall.
But then, wonder of wonders, out of the Behavioural Insights Team, as it is formally known, emerged common sense so beautiful and bracing that it was like being nudged by Marilyn Monroe.
Suppose, asks Professor Paul Dolan of the London School of Economics, a former stalwart of the unit, happiness is not owning the latest, smartest mobile phone, but is, in fact, having that phone switched off? Suppose silence truly is golden, a necessary antidote to a shrill, intrusive world?
The problem with smartphones, warns Dolan, is that they distract users’ attention from the people around them. “Turning your phone off and enjoying being with your friends is much better for you than constantly checking your phone and emails,” he told an audience at the Hay Festival in Cartagena, Colombia.
He is hardly a lone voice. He is only articulating something that millions share: a vague sense that our super-connected world is also dangerously disconnected from things that matter.
Switching off your mobile can improve your emotional health — as I found from personal experience last year. I was travelling in the States, left my mobile phone at the hotel and, for the next two hours, felt anxious and disorientated. Suppose something happened to my loved ones? Suppose so-and-so needed to get hold of me? All the usual neuroses of the middle-aged male.
But then, as sanity returned, the feelings of anxiety abated. After four hours of being cut off from what I had come to regard as civilization, I felt as relaxed as if I’d had a particularly good lunch. After six hours, I was in such a happy space that, when I finally got back to the hotel and was reunited with my phone, I felt not relief, but resentment. Did my life have to revolve around that little electronic tyrant? Couldn’t its biddings wait?
The next day, and for the following five days, I left my phone in the hotel and resolved to check my messages no more than once a day.
The result was as dramatic as it was heartening. Until you sever your links with the people you are in touch with 24/7, you don’t realize quite how stressful those links are.
I found myself paying closer attention to the world around me: enjoying the sights and sounds of America, and having conversations that felt like real conversations.
Dolan has clearly had similar epiphanies. His plea for reduced dependency on mobile phones throws down the gauntlet to a generation that, in its fascination with new technology, has got its priorities askew.
One of the defining images of the 21st century is rows of men in suits on airplanes switching on their phones within nanoseconds of their planes landing. They have mistaken ergonomic efficiency for coolness: they think they are demonstrating energy and dynamism. They cannot see how pathetic they look, clutching at the umbilical cord that links them to their bosses/girlfriends/bookmakers.
The next time they land at Heathrow, they should try waiting five minutes before switching on their mobiles. Then 10 minutes. Then 20. It could be the saving of them.
The problem with smartphones, warns Prof. Paul Dolan of the London School of Economics, is that they distract users’ attention from the people around them.